AI & ML
Concordance-Optimal Continuous Music Emotion Estimation: Variance Decomposition, Dual-Branch Temporal Fusion, and Conformal Prediction Intervals
arXiv cs.SD0 views
arXiv:2611.08966v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Continuous music emotion recognition (MER) estimates how Arousal and Valence evolve within a song, yet the field's standard metric, pooled frame-level correlation, is dominated by between-song differences and cannot distinguish a model that tracks emotional dynamics from one that only ranks songs by their average level. We decompose annotation variance into between- and within-song components and show that mean squared error (MSE) targets the former, while windowed Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC = $r \cdot C_b$) targets the latter by penalising the variance compression MSE induces. A single weight $\lambda$ controls the trade-off: on 1,764 DEAM songs, raising $\lambda$ from 0 to 1 lowers pooled Arousal $r$ from 0.843 to 0.810 while raising mean within-song $r$ from 0.204 to 0.368. Building on this objective, we present MMAS (Multimodal Music Analysis System), an open-source model that predicts Arousal and Valence every 0.5 s from raw audio. It fuses frozen MERT-v1-95M embeddings with ten symbolic features from automatic transcription through a dual-branch temporal convolutional network with cross-modal attention. Because both branches are audio-derived, one model trains jointly on DEAM and PMEmo without domain conditioning. Under song-grouped 5-fold cross-validation (2,531 songs), pooled $r$ reaches 0.801/0.685 (Arousal/Valence) on DEAM and 0.742/0.746 on PMEmo. Against a ridge baseline on identical features, within-song Arousal $r$ roughly triples (0.344 vs. 0.125; $n = 353$ songs, Wilcoxon $p = 1.7 \times 10^{-21}$, $d = 0.56$). Complete transcription failure costs at most 0.04 pooled $r$. Split-conformal intervals attain 93.7% (Arousal) and 90.0% (Valence) marginal coverage at a 95% target, with the shortfall traced to within-song dependence. MMAS is released as a pip-installable package.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08966PreviousFuzzy-FedAvg: Server-Aware Client Selection for Federated Speech Emotion Recognition in Heterogeneous EnvironmentsNextReal-Time Short-Response Selection for Spoken Dialogue Systems
Related posts
![AMR AI and Embodied Intelligence — Ch.11: Self Supervised Robot Learning [EN]](https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fh8y4egw0kdqtzf6m3hzx.png)
AMR AI and Embodied Intelligence — Ch.11: Self Supervised Robot Learning [EN]
0dev.to
![AMR AI and Embodied Intelligence — Ch.13: Human Robot Interaction [EN]](https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fjm36fpwnygomah6qsu4n.png)
AMR AI and Embodied Intelligence — Ch.13: Human Robot Interaction [EN]
0dev.to
![AMR AI and Embodied Intelligence — Ch.14: VLM and VLA [EN]](https://media2.dev.to/dynamic/image/width=800%2Cheight=%2Cfit=scale-down%2Cgravity=auto%2Cformat=auto/https%3A%2F%2Fdev-to-uploads.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com%2Fuploads%2Farticles%2Fo06nxmfdm3t6o1oznau9.png)
AMR AI and Embodied Intelligence — Ch.14: VLM and VLA [EN]
0dev.to
370 Books in 20 months: South African author defends her use of AI
0Hacker News
The climate case for AI has not been made
0MIT Technology Review
I Let Pangram Loose on My Gmail Inbox. Here’s How Much AI It Found
0Wired