AI & ML
Electromagnetically Consistent Monostatic ISAC Beamforming: Mutual Coupling, Active Mismatch and Tx-Rx Leakage in Compact Dipole Arrays
arXiv eess.SP0 views
arXiv:2611.08331v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Beamforming for integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) is usually designed on ideal array manifolds with a norm constraint on the transmit signal. In a compact monostatic transceiver this hides three antenna effects: distorted embedded patterns, beam-dependent active mismatch at the power amplifiers, and transmit-to-receive leakage that raises the radar noise floor. We build a multiport scattering model of a shared-aperture dipole array directly from method-of-moments simulations and use it to formulate a Cramer-Rao bound minimizing ISAC beamformer with multiuser SINR constraints, per-port active reflection constraints and a leakage budget, solved as a semidefinite program with a one-dimensional budget search. Full-wave evaluation shows that coupling-unaware designs miss their SINR targets by up to 6.2 dB and drive amplifiers to an equivalent VSWR above 3.3 at small spacings. For spacings from 0.3 to 0.5 wavelengths, the proposed design meets all targets with an equivalent VSWR below 2 and lowers the root Cramer-Rao bound by 32 to 53 percent for 80 dB of self-interference cancellation and by a factor of 3.4 to 5.6 for 70 dB. An independent finite-difference time-domain model of the final layout in openEMS confirms that the leakage null and the ranking of the designs are preserved.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08331PreviousWireless Link Scheduling with Graph Signal DiffusionNextCore-Lock Scheduling for 5G NR LDPC Decoders
Related posts
How to Convert Any Webpage to Clean Markdown for RAG & Save 90% LLM Tokens in Node.js
0dev.to
Calibration‑free top‑k MoE selector saves tuning
0dev.to
How to Evaluate RAG Retrieval in 2026: Question Sets, Metrics That Mislead, and a Practical Recipe
0dev.to
Reading a Competitor's Pricing Page Like an Engineer
0dev.to
Day 4: Adding VLAN support
0dev.to

Browser-local image tools: how to check the upload boundary
0dev.to