AI & ML
Information Loss Is All You Need: $TC^0$ Pseudorandomness from Worst-Case Lattices
arXiv cs.CR0 views
arXiv:2611.05136v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Can deterministic information loss yield post-quantum pseudorandomness with $TC^0$ evaluation? We show that deterministic rounding achieves this under quantum worst-case lattice hardness, with fixed polynomial parameters and no predetermined sample bound. We introduce learning with algebraic rounding (LAR), which applies an explicit integer rounding map to blocks of secret-dependent linear measurements and encodes the result in a lattice quotient. For one fixed family with polynomially bounded modulus and dimensions, deterministic labels on exactly uniform, secret-independent public matrices are computationally indistinguishable from independent uniform labels for every polynomial number of classical random examples. Our classical reduction from Gaussian LWE, combined with the quantum worst-case reduction to LWE, bases LAR on GapSVP and SIVP over general lattices at approximation factor $\widetilde{O}(q)$, where $q$ is the modulus. The proof uses source-independent affine transport: public affine maps sampled independently of the hidden errors transport the Gaussian error law close to uniform on the rounding map's zero-label fiber while preserving exactly uniform public matrices. For every fixed inverse-polynomial accuracy, we give a polynomial-time sampler for the same public parameter family. This yields the first post-quantum weak pseudorandom function with joint key-and-input evaluation in $TC^0$, secure against uniform quantum polynomial-time distinguishers given any polynomial number of classical uniform random examples. We also prove hardness of learning polynomial-size two-hidden-layer ReLU networks from noiseless uniform random examples, even for quantum polynomial-time improper learners.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05136PreviousBackdoor Purification for LoRA-Tuned LLMs via Null-Space ProjectionNextRouteAlign: Aligning Task Requirements with Model Profiles for LLM Service Selection
Related posts
Stripe doesn't open accounts in 37 of the 85 countries we checked. Here are the legal ways to get paid anyway
0dev.to
Do AI Models Care About Each Other? Anthropic's Multi-Agent Welfare Study Says Yes — With a Catch
0dev.to
Building VARYN: Why Permission Boundaries Matter More Than Another AI API Call
0dev.to
App Store 2026 in numbers: AI, pricing, abandoned apps
0Hacker News
ASUS Launches New Zenbook 14 in India With Ceraluminum Design and OLED Display
0FOSS Bytes
TOP BEARINGS SRL conduce în Intermedieri produse diverse Argeș
0dev.to Data