Backend
Multi-Agent Coordinated Rename Refactoring
arXiv cs.SE0 views
arXiv:2601.00482v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The primary value of AI agents in software development lies in their ability to extend the developer's capacity for reasoning and action, not to supplant human involvement. To showcase how to use agents working in tandem with developers, we designed a novel approach for carrying out coordinated renaming. Coordinated renaming, where a single rename refactoring triggers refactorings in multiple, related identifiers, is a frequent yet challenging task. Developers must manually propagate these rename refactorings across numerous files and contexts, a process that is both tedious and highly error-prone. State-of-the-art heuristic-based approaches produce an overwhelming number of false positives, while vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs) provide incomplete suggestions due to their limited context and inability to interact with refactoring tools. This leaves developers with incomplete refactorings or burdens them with filtering too many false positives. Coordinated renaming is exactly the kind of repetitive task that agents can significantly reduce the developers' burden while keeping them in the driver's seat. We designed, implemented, and evaluated the first multi-agent framework that automates coordinated renaming. It operates on a key insight: a developer's initial refactoring is a clue to infer the scope of related refactorings. Our Scope Inference Agent first transforms this clue into an explicit, natural-language Declared Scope. The Planned Execution Agent then uses this as a strict plan to identify program elements that should undergo refactoring and safely executes the changes by invoking the IDE's own trusted refactoring APIs. Finally, the Replication Agent uses it to guide the project-wide search. We first conducted a formative study on the practice of coordinated renaming in 609K commits in 100 open-source projects and surveyed 205 developers ...
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.00482PreviousComparative Analysis of Agent Evaluation Frameworks: Stability, Detection, and Discovery in Enterprise Analytics AgentsNextArkEval: Benchmarking and Evaluating Automated CodeRepair for ArkTS
Related posts

JavaScript Deobfuscator Output: Reading It Layer by Layer
0dev.to

Building a Python Framework to Monitor IDMC Taskflow Execution
0dev.to
Best self-hosted PaaS in 2026: six tools compared
0dev.to
DKIM Domain Verification: A Compliance-Evidence Guide for Fintech Email
0dev.to
Realtime Presence Sidebar: Node.js Room Cleanup and Update Guarantees
0dev.to
Weekly Digest Retry Design Explained (SaaS Queue, Cron, DLQ, Cost)
0dev.to