Security
Quantum Key Exchange from Public Quantum Money
arXiv cs.CR0 views
arXiv:2611.05985v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Two-message quantum key exchange (2QKE) cannot be realized in a statistically secure way, and therefore some computational assumptions are required. So far, the known weakest assumption for 2QKE is the existence of one-way functions (OWFs). Can we construct 2QKE from a weaker assumption than OWFs? In this paper, we give the first complete characterization of 2QKE. We show that the following four primitives are (existentially) equivalent: everlasting-secure 2QKE, standard 2QKE, efficiently-verifiable state puzzles (EV-StatePuzzs), and one-time secure digital signatures with quantum signatures and signing keys. Because EV-StatePuzzs are potentially weaker than OWFs [Kretschmer, Qian and Tal 2025], the equivalence implies that 2QKE are potentially weaker than OWFs. Moreover, our result shows the equivalence between standard 2QKE and everlasting-secure 2QKE, which means that everlasting security comes for free. Finally, one-shot signatures, quantum lightning, and public-key quantum money mini-schemes imply EV-StatePuzzs, and therefore, our result also gives a new lowerbound, namely everlasting-secure 2QKE, of these public-key unclonable primitives. We also show that one-shot signatures imply QPKE with quantum public keys. [Kitagawa, Morimae,Nishimaki and Yamakawa, 2024] constructed QPKE with quantum public keys from OWFs, and it was open whether QPKE with quantum public keys can be constructed from an assumption weaker than or incomparable to OWFs. Our result gives a potential answer to this question since one-shot signatures seem to be incomparable with OWFs. Moreover, QPKE constructed from one-shot signatures has an additional functionality, which we call certified freeze, that allows the receiver to publish a publicly verifiable classical certificate that computationally binds the receiver to an upper bound on the total number of distinct valid ciphertexts under its verification key.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.05985PreviousTrinetra.Q: Statistical and Behavioral Detection of Attacks on the Quantum-Error-Correction Layer and Classical Control Stack of Quantum Computing SystemsNextCatastrophic Overfitting is Weight Drift the Training Loss Cannot See
Related posts
Things that Matter -- Identifying Interactions and IoT Device Types in Encrypted Matter Traffic
0arXiv cs.CR
Automated Exploit and Security Test Generation: A Systematic Literature Review
0arXiv cs.CR
A Post-Quantum Interactive Hashing Theorem
0arXiv cs.CR
Demystifying Information Flow Downgrading using the Real--Ideal Paradigm
0arXiv cs.CR
🚨 CISA confirms active exploitation of a WordPress Core vulnerability: CVE-2026-119977. The TOCTOU flaw could allow unauthenticated remote code execution during the upgrade process. WordPress fixed
0dev.to Security
Secrecy and Covertness Analysis of SWAN-Enabled Uplink EDMA-NOMA Systems
0arXiv eess.SP