AI & ML
Series-wise Cross-validation for Global Time Series Forecasting
arXiv stat.ML0 views
arXiv:2611.08252v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We consider the problem of cross-validation (CV) in time series forecasting, with a focus on global forecasting models based on deep learning. The prevailing CV strategy in forecasting is to partition data across time with the last part of each series used for testing. With global models trained on collections of time series, however, a fundamentally different approach becomes possible: partitioning across series and time. We formalize series-wise CV for global forecasting models and benchmark several instantiations, including K-fold CV, bootstrapping, and Monte Carlo CV, on 11 datasets with 10 neural network architectures. We evaluate CV procedures along five dimensions: performance estimation, overoptimism rate, model selection accuracy, regret, and downstream forecasting performance. We withhold a random fraction of series from training so that they appear only in the test set. This protocol simulates the emergence of new series not seen during training, a common scenario in global forecasting. Under this protocol, our results reveal a nuanced trade-off: series-wise CV yields better downstream forecasting accuracy by guiding model selection toward configurations that generalize across both time and series, while time-wise CV retains a slight advantage for estimating out-of-sample error.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08252PreviousPatch Attention Wisely: Understanding Patch Length in Attention-Based ForecastingNextUnifying Central Flow, Rod Flow, and the Edge Coupling
Related posts
Are LLM Safety Judges Policy-Invariant? A Three-Principle Stress-Test
0arXiv cs.SE
Vibe Coding in Software Development: A Multivocal Literature Review
0arXiv cs.SE
Large Language Models for Multi-Lingual Equivalent Mutant Detection: An Extended Empirical Study
0arXiv cs.SE
Characterizing Robustness in Semantic Code Clone Detection
0arXiv cs.SE
AI Slop and the Software Commons
0arXiv cs.SE
Detecting Silent Faults at the Environment-Trainer Boundary in Reinforcement Learning
0arXiv cs.SE