A good CI/CD pipeline is boring. Every change goes through the same steps, deploys look the same every time, and rolling back takes seconds.
This post builds a minimal pipeline for a containerised app using GitHub Actions. The principles also apply to other CI systems and cloud providers.
Principles first
- Build once. Create a single artefact (a container image) and promote that same artefact through staging and production. Don't rebuild per environment, or you're not testing what you ship.
- Make artefacts immutable. Tag images with the commit SHA. Avoid deploying
latest, because you can't tell what it is or roll back to it reliably. - Keep config out of the image. Environment variables and secrets come from the environment at runtime.
- Automate the check after deploy. A deploy isn't done until a health check passes.
Step 1: Test and build on every push
# .github/workflows/ci.yml name: ci on: push: branches: [main] pull_request: jobs: test: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - uses: actions/setup-node@v4 with: node-version: 20 cache: npm - run: npm ci - run: npm run lint --if-present - run: npm test build: needs: test if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/main' runs-on: ubuntu-latest permissions: contents: read packages: write steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@v3 - uses: docker/login-action@v3 with: registry: ghcr.io username: ${{ github.actor }} password: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} - uses: docker/build-push-action@v6 with: context: . push: true tags: ghcr.io/${{ github.repository }}:${{ github.sha }} cache-from: type=gha cache-to: type=gha,mode=max Pull requests run tests only. Merges to main also build and push an image tagged with the exact commit.
Step 2: A small, secure Dockerfile
FROM node:20-alpine AS build WORKDIR /app COPY package*.json ./ RUN npm ci COPY . . RUN npm run build FROM node:20-alpine WORKDIR /app ENV NODE_ENV=production COPY --from=build /app/dist ./dist COPY package*.json ./ RUN npm ci --omit=dev USER node EXPOSE 3000 CMD ["node", "dist/server.js"] Multi-stage builds keep the final image small, and USER node avoids running as root.
Step 3: Deploy the exact image
How you deploy depends on your platform (ECS, Kubernetes, Cloud Run, a VM with Docker, and so on). The pattern is the same: tell the platform to run the image tagged with this commit SHA.
deploy-staging: needs: build runs-on: ubuntu-latest environment: staging steps: - name: Deploy image run: | echo "Deploying ghcr.io/${{ github.repository }}:${{ github.sha }} to staging" # replace with your platform's command, for example: # kubectl set image deployment/app app=ghcr.io/${{ github.repository }}:${{ github.sha }} - name: Wait for health check run: | for i in {1..20}; do if curl -fsS https://staging.example.com/healthz; then exit 0; fi sleep 5 done echo "Health check failed" && exit 1 deploy-production: needs: deploy-staging runs-on: ubuntu-latest environment: production # add required reviewers in repo settings steps: - name: Deploy the same image run: echo "Deploying the same SHA to production" Using GitHub Environments lets you add required approvals for production and keep secrets separate per environment.
Step 4: Add a real health endpoint
app.get("/healthz", async (req, res) => { try { await db.query("SELECT 1"); // check critical dependencies res.status(200).json({ status: "ok" }); } catch { res.status(503).json({ status: "unhealthy" }); } }); Keep it fast and cheap. Platforms use it to decide whether to send traffic to a new version, and your pipeline uses it to decide whether a deploy succeeded.
Step 5: Rollback is just another deploy
Because every image is tagged with a commit SHA, rolling back means deploying the previous known-good SHA. No rebuild required.
# example: redeploy the previous version kubectl set image deployment/app app=ghcr.io/org/app:<previous-sha> Practice this before you need it. A rollback you've never tried isn't a plan.
Beyond the basics
- Secrets: prefer short-lived credentials via OIDC (for example, GitHub Actions to AWS, Azure or GCP) over long-lived keys stored in secrets.
- Infrastructure as code: manage cloud resources with Terraform or similar, reviewed through pull requests.
- Progressive delivery: canary or blue/green releases reduce the impact of a bad deploy.
- Observability: logs, metrics and alerts tied to each release, so you can see when a deploy changed behaviour.
- Database migrations: make them backward-compatible so old and new versions can run side by side during a rollout.
Checklist
- [ ] One build, promoted across environments
- [ ] Images tagged by commit SHA, never
latest - [ ] Config and secrets injected at runtime
- [ ] Health check gates every deploy
- [ ] Manual approval for production
- [ ] Rollback tested
What does your deployment pipeline look like, and what's the one thing you'd change?
Further reading: Cloud DevOps Solutions

