AI & ML
A Preconditioned Quantum Linear Solver for Periodic Two-Phase Heat Conduction with Mesh-Independent Condition Number
arXiv cs.NA0 views
arXiv:2610.41690v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We consider here computational homogenization of a periodic two-phase conduction problem. Quantum linear-system algorithms for its finite element discretization are limited by the condition number of the stiffness matrix. This condition number grows quadratically with the number of elements per side. Classically, preconditioning by the homogeneous (single-phase) operator bounds the condition number by the conductivity contrast, for every mesh size. On a quantum computer, however, a preconditioner encoded as a separate factor multiplies the subnormalizations, and the quadratic dependency returns. In this paper, we absorb the closed-form inverse square root of the homogeneous operator into the finite element factors. The preconditioned operator then becomes the product of a norm-preserving gradient operator $\mat{V}$, a diagonal matrix of scaled conductivities, and $\mat{V}^T$. Each factor has norm at most one. The block encoding therefore has subnormalization one, and its condition number is bounded by just the conductivity contrast, for every mesh size and in every dimension. The operator $\mat{V}$ is applied as a quantum Fourier transform, a small rotation at each wavenumber, and an inverse transform. Quantum singular value transformation then block-encodes the inverse of the preconditioned operator. We test the method numerically on three periodic cells with up to $10^6$ unknowns. The results confirm that the condition number does not depend on the mesh, and the energy-norm error of the inverse is below the polynomial tolerance at every mesh. On meshes of $4 \times 4$ and $8 \times 8$ elements, we also build the entire inverse as one Qiskit circuit and simulate it by state vector, with the rotation at each wavenumber built from uniformly controlled rotations. The output state agrees with the finite element solution to within the polynomial tolerance.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41690PreviousA Gaussian Process Regression-Enhanced Two-Sweep Parameterized Power Method for Computing Extreme EigenpairsNextNumerical analysis of linear finite element methods for the Gross--Pitaevskii eigenvalue problem
Related posts
Most voted crypto projects on Coinvote, Oct 26 to Nov 1, 2026
0dev.to Data
Bluesky This Week — trending topics & AI brand mentions (2026-11-02)
0dev.to Data
Gemini 4 Carbon e DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Cyber: a Guerra Cibernética Autônoma e o Topo do Artificial Analysis
0dev.to Machine Learning
What can an AI agent do for you every day?
0dev.to Machine Learning
Mon modèle de paris semblait excellent sur 3 671 prédictions. Il n'a jamais battu le bookmaker.
0dev.to Machine Learning
HR manager LinkedIn About section examples you can adapt
0dev.to Career