AI & ML
A Systematic Study of Cross-Modal Typographic Attacks on Audio-Visual Reasoning
arXiv cs.SD0 views
arXiv:2604.03995v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: As audio-visual multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly deployed in safety-critical applications, understanding their cross-modal vulnerabilities is essential. To this end, we introduce Multi-Modal Typography, a systematic study examining how perturbations added to speech and on-screen text impact audio-visual reasoning of closed- and open-source models. For instance, on the WorldSense benchmark, the attack success rate (ASR) against Gemini 3.7 Flash increased from 9.53\% to 43.41\%, highlighting its vulnerability. We analyze the cross-modal effects of unimodal and multimodal attacks and evaluate how specific properties of the attacks impact the overall multi-modal reasoning. By applying fine-tuning as a mitigation, we lower the ASR of Qwen2.5-Omni-7B on WorldSense from $60.6\%$ to $52.0\%$. Our findings across multi-modal reasoning tasks, content moderation, and offline robot task selection benchmarks establish multi-modal typography as a critical and underexplored attack strategy in multi-modal reasoning. Code and data will be made publicly available.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03995PreviousAdaptDuplex: From Static to Adaptive Full-Duplex Spoken DialogueNextEchoDistill: Robust Large Audio Language Models via Noisy-to-Clean Self-Distillation
Related posts
Hybrid retrieval with reciprocal rank fusion: notes from a RAG prototype
0dev.to
It is in co-creating, together. As humans do.
0dev.to
C64 Basic Dungeon Crawler: Stairs, Levels and Levelling Up (Part 11)
0Hacker News
Anthropic's internal AI use, at retail prices, now exceeds its employee pay
0Hacker News
Launch HN: Momentic (YC W24) – Agents that catch bugs by using your app
0Hacker News

Behavioral Design Unpacked: Nudges, Funnels & Persuasion | UX Unpacked #3
0dev.to UX