AI & ML
Autoregressive Physics-Informed Neural Operator Surrogates and Joint 4-D Seismic-Production Bayesian History Matching
arXiv stat.ML0 views
arXiv:2610.31677v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We present a surrogate-accelerated Bayesian history-matching framework, demonstrated on a realistic synthetic model ($N=100{,}188$ cells). The forward map $\mathcal{G}$ is replaced by a Fourier neural operator $\mathcal{G}_\theta$ trained in a closed loop, $\hat{x}_{n+1}=\mathcal{G}_\theta(u,\hat{x}_n)$, with the discrete black-oil residual $R(x_{n+1},x_n)$ as a physics-informed neural operator (PINO) penalty, truncated backpropagation and noise injection. We assimilate production data and 4-D seismic using adaptive regularised ensemble Kalman inversion (aREKI), and synthesise $\Delta V_p$ inside the rollout via a closed-form Gassmann transform of the surrogate, under a two-stage schedule (aREKI on production, then an ensemble smoother with multiple data assimilation, ES-MDA, on both). To temper the ill-posedness, we invert $(\log K,\phi)$ not in $\mathbb{R}^{2N}$, where $N_e\ll 2N$ leaves a rank-deficient covariance and a null space the data never inform, but on a chart $u=\Psi(\tilde m)$, $\tilde m\in\mathbb{R}^{d}$, $d\ll 2N$, given by a Parseval-exact truncated cosine transform or a variational auto-encoder decoder. The ensemble then spans its own search space; the directions the data cannot constrain are cut to those the chart can express, and every member decodes to a geologically plausible field. For the rollout we prove an exposure bound $W_1\le\sum_j L^{\,n-1-j}\mathbb{E}e_j$, a physics-penalty contraction $\|D_x\mathcal{G}_\theta\|\le\alpha<1$ under a small residual defect, and an $\mathcal{O}(\rho^K)$ truncation bias. A Loewner-order inequality $\mathcal{I}_p\preceq\mathcal{I}_p+\mathcal{I}_s$ explains why joint assimilation is no less informative. On held-out data, $\mathcal{G}_\theta$ attains $R^2>0.999$ on pressure and saturation and rolls out in $0.579$ s, a $\sim2500\times$ speed-up, bringing an $N_e=190$-member, $N_a=10$-iteration joint inversion within one GPU-hour.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31677PreviousReading a Hardware-Equivalence Claim Like an Evaluator: A Checklist Applied to an NPU vs GPU Pretraining TwinNextEarly learning in large residual networks
Related posts
Qodo builds context into AI code review with Codex
0OpenAI Blog

Ford promises not to sell your driving habits to data brokers
0The Verge
Snap settles lawsuit accusing platform of fueling teen depression and eating disorders
0TechCrunch
Scrape LinkedIn job postings without logging in (Python + Google Sheets)
0dev.to
Same model, same defences: 7 document attacks down to 0, chat attacks barely moved
0dev.to
Skill to Create Product Videos
0Hacker News