AI & ML
Beamfocusing Versus Airy Beams: Does Antenna Blockage Require Beam Bending?
arXiv math.IT0 views
arXiv:2610.28557v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Airy beams are often proposed in array beamforming to bend beams around obstacles. We prove that, for a single-antenna receiver, conventional beamfocusing maximizes the received power regardless of how many antennas are blocked and, in expectation, even with phase errors in the channel state information. This also holds for multi-antenna receivers under a phase-separability condition that is satisfied in rank-one channels. Numerical results confirm that unmodified beamfocusing is optimal for physically small receivers (i.e., those that fit within the beamwidth) when an obstacle is present. For physically larger receivers, the optimal precoding deviates from beamfocusing to better illuminate the receiver's unobstructed parts, but will not become Airy beams. While Airy beams can be configured to perform well, their ability to follow a bent trajectory in front of an obstacle does not maximize the received power behind it.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28557PreviousTiming and Reliability Limits of Position-Assisted UWB Multicast AudioNextOne-weight codes in the sum-rank metric
Related posts
Heated mirror reveals hidden 3D patterns in rising air near a wall
0Phys.org Tech
Infrared-transparent aerogel boosts performance of subambient daytime radiative cooling materials by up to 5.2°C
0Phys.org Tech
Tracing the online networks behind AI-generated nude images
0Phys.org Tech
Microsoft's AI Risk Report Misses This Key Detail
0Dark Reading
Introducing the Grid Protectors Program
0OpenAI Blog
The world has a new plan to save nature, but it still needs the money
0Ars Technica