AI & ML
ChoreoStudio: Planning What, When, and Who in Music-Driven Group Choreography
arXiv cs.SD0 views
arXiv:2610.32325v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Music-driven group dance generation must decide not only how each dancer moves, but also what formation the group should form, when it should change, and who should execute each transition. Existing methods can generate orderly and rhythmically synchronized group motion, but remain limited in formation evolution and inter-dancer interaction. In human choreography, formation transitions often align with changes in high-level musical structure, such as the progression from an introduction to a chorus or from a chorus to a climax. We present ChoreoStudio, which makes choreography planning explicit. A music disentangler first decomposes the audio into frame-level rhythmic features and segment-level structural features. Given the segment-level features and sparse labels, a frozen omni-modal model acts as a scriptwriter, producing a global semantic description that guides the Director's choreography planning. Based on this context, the Director produces three coupled interaction decisions: a centroid-relative point set specifies what formation to produce, a transition gate determines when it should change, and a mobility allocation indicates who should execute the transition. The transition gate and mobility allocation are further conditioned on the planned geometric change, coupling formation targets with their temporal and dancer-specific execution. At a finer temporal scale, frame-aligned music features condition the diffusion generator to control detailed body motion and preserve beat-level alignment. The segment-level interaction plan is injected in parallel through frame-aligned instruction tokens and cross-dancer attention biases, coordinating how the generator realizes each transition. Experiments on AIOZ-GDance demonstrate that ChoreoStudio follows the planned interactions while achieving state-of-the-art performance in motion quality, group organization, and formation dynamics.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.32325PreviousMI-MIDI 2: From Observation to Control with Sparse Autoencoders in Text-to-MIDI GenerationNextMusicTwins: Training Audio-Language Models to Listen like Their Persona
Related posts

What Arconatese 3-4 Pontedera tells us about Serie D - Girone D
0dev.to Watercooler
Your AI agent got an HTTP error. Should it retry?
0dev.to Discuss
Is AI dangerous, or just misunderstood?
0dev.to Discuss
Why we price a developer tool per fix instead of per seat
0dev.to Productivity
My LLM-Powered Sidekick for Painless PR Descriptions
0dev.to Productivity
Reward-Adaptive Backtracking GFlowNet: A Technique Worth Understanding
0dev.to Productivity