AI & ML
Closed-loop evaluation of LLM agents for embedded software development
arXiv cs.SE0 views
arXiv:2610.11447v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as coding agents that edit files, run builds and tests, inspect execution results, and repair software iteratively. Embedded firmware is a demanding target because correctness depends on closed-loop behavior under sensing, timing, and safety constraints, not only on static source quality. Yet embedded-agent evaluation remains limited and often emphasizes one-shot synthesis or offline correctness. We present a benchmark for closed-loop evaluation of embedded coding agents. Each task provides a plain-text engineering description, constrained workspace, and visible build-and-runtime surface. The agent must translate requirements into implementation and self-verification steps, then iterate until the required device behavior is achieved. The suite contains five embedded-control tasks and four feedback scenarios: one-shot generation, realistic self-verification, CI-style red/green feedback, and oracle-style detailed feedback. The implementation targets simulated ESP32 firmware for reproducibility. We evaluate seven GPT-family and Qwen-family configurations across five tasks and four scenarios, with three repetitions per condition for 420 runs. gpt-5.4 has the highest pass rate among evaluated configurations but does not saturate the benchmark; qwen3.5-27B is the strongest observed local model; and smaller local models degrade sharply in pass rate and search efficiency. These results suggest that capable local embedded coding agents are emerging.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11447PreviousCharacterizing Overconfident Failure in LLM-Based Code GenerationNextEvaluating Local Language Model Agents for Reproducible Data Engineering: An Empirical Software Engineering Study of Mobility Workflows
Related posts
The Autonomous Edge — Issue #13: Cheaper Agents, Harder Governance (Week of November 2, 2026)
0dev.to AI

Plano Físico vs Plano Funcional en AWS Networking: cómo los arquitectos senior resuelven lo que otros no ven
0dev.to AWS
We built Origami Tutor: free paper-craft lessons you can turn and replay in 3D
0dev.to WebDev
From two authorized photos to a short AI rap video (consent-first workflow)
0dev.to WebDev
Check a File Hash in the Browser, Without Uploading the File
0dev.to WebDev
Your AI keys were leaked at a platform. A local guard you can paste catches the abuse before the invoice.
0dev.to Security