AI & ML
Data-driven mitigation of catastrophic forgetting in dynamic physical layer attack detection
arXiv cs.NI0 views
arXiv:2607.01041v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Optical networks are critical infrastructure that underpins global communications, and detecting security breaches that jeopardize them is essential to maintaining worldwide connectivity. As malicious actors continuously evolve their attack techniques, dynamically updated intrusion detection models have become a key component of modern defense mechanisms. By incorporating newly acquired telemetry data, these models can adapt to emerging threats while maintaining high detection performance. However, when previously encountered attacks reappear after a prolonged period of absence, adaptive models may fail to recognize them due to the phenomenon of catastrophic forgetting. In contrast, statically trained models can reliably detect attacks represented in the original training data but lack the ability to adapt to previously unseen attack patterns. Consequently, intrusion detection systems face a fundamental tradeoff between adaptability to evolving threats and long-term retention of previously acquired knowledge. In this work, we propose a data-driven mechanism to cope with catastrophic forgetting in dynamic attack detection systems. Our approach balances the model update datasets by using parts of past attack data. We utilize a threshold-based mechanism to trigger data balancing after accuracy drops due to an active attack change. Applied to an experimental optical network security dataset, the proposed approach reduces the average model adaptation time by 37% compared to its dynamic counterpart that does not employ data balancing. Compared to a baseline from the literature that relies on neural network depth increasing, our approach requires 6% fewer data batches to adapt to changing conditions and regain performance.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.01041PreviousBACC: Budget-Aware Calibration and Control for Horizontal AutoscalingNextSequential vs. Synchronized Entanglement Swapping: QKD Secret-Key Rate under Optimized Link-Layer Control
Related posts
Introducing the Grid Protectors Program
0OpenAI Blog
The world has a new plan to save nature, but it still needs the money
0Ars Technica

Could data center backlash flip Florida?
0The Verge

Vivo’s first Pro Max phone proves its Ultra is still in a league of its own
0The Verge

Why Peacock is making a huge bet on YouTube
0The Verge
Ninja’s first-ever microwave just replaced two of my kitchen appliances at once
0TechCrunch