General
Decentralized Dynamic Stable Matching
arXiv cs.DC0 views
arXiv:2610.41912v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study decentralized computation of the player-optimal stable matching (POSM) with unannounced player arrivals and departures. Without a common clock, event information, or direct communication, players propose to arms and observe only their own accept/reject outcomes. Mismatch cost counts rounds when the realized matching differs from the current POSM. For known preferences, we give a deterministic polynomial-time self-calibrating protocol with cost $O(t_*+K^2\log T)$, improving the previous bound $O(T^{1-1/K}(\log T)^{2/K})$. Here $K$ is the number of arms, $t_*$ the last event time, and $T$ the horizon. Players use only local time and proposal outcomes, knowing neither $t_*$ nor $T$. For any nondecreasing, polynomial-time-computable $g(t)=\Omega(t)$, the protocol achieves $O(g(t_*)+K^2N_g(T))$. Here $g$ governs recovery time, while $N_g(T)$ counts iterations of $t\mapsto t+g(t)$ below $T$, exposing a tradeoff between recovery time and asymptotic mismatch cost. Any randomized protocol with recovery scale $g(t)\ge1$ and sublinear asymptotic mismatch cost has worst-case expected cost $\Omega(t_*+N_g(T))$. Thus, with $g(t)=t$, our protocol is optimal up to a $K^2$ factor among sublinear-cost protocols with $O(t_*)$ recovery time. For unknown preferences on both sides, each player and arm learns its preferences from its own observations after matching. We give a decentralized learning protocol with expected cost $O(t_*+K^4\Delta_{\mathrm{min}}^{-2}\log T)$, where $\Delta_{\mathrm{min}}$ measures preference gaps. A complementary static-setting lower bound adapted from the literature shows that the dependence on $T$ and $\Delta_{\mathrm{min}}$ is tight.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41912PreviousLayered Reproducibility for High-Performance Computing Applications: The Feel++ and Ktirio Urban Buildings Case StudyNextMatching Workloads to Blackwell: Power-Resolved Benchmarking of NVIDIA B200 and B300 across HPC and AI Workloads
Related posts
Get 25 Percent Off My Favorite Renter-Friendly Storage Lockers
0Wired

The 16GB Raspberry Pi 5 got another ‘unavoidable’ RAM price hike
0The Verge
Do practice partners actually help when you start speaking Chinese?
0dev.to

How we halved DNS build delay and cut memory use by 85%
0Cloudflare Blog
Birdbuddy vs. Birdfy: Which Budget Smart Feeder Should You Buy? (2026)
0Wired
2 days till TechCrunch Founder Summit: Boston founders don’t need a Silicon Valley address to build something big
0TechCrunch