AI & ML
Demystifying When and Why VLAs Fail in Contact-Rich Tasks and How to Fix Them
arXiv cs.RO0 views
arXiv:2608.01402v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We address the problem of understanding when and why Vision-Language-Action models struggle with contact-rich manipulation tasks that require precise physical interaction. Prior work has primarily focused on addressing contact failures through force-augmented architectures and training-time regularizers, yet the factors contributing to these failures remain underexplored. We identify two distinct failure modes underlying this gap. Precision failures occur when policies struggle to produce the small, accurate corrective actions required during contact and force failures occur when policies fail to respond to contact forces. To address these failures, we propose FACT. During post-training, FACT increases low noise sampling to improve fine action prediction and incorporates structured force conditioning to guide action generation using contact state and force history. FACT achieves an average success rate of 66% across five contact-rich tasks against 41% for the best prior baseline, in an evaluation spanning almost 2,500 real-world rollouts.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01402PreviousDiagnosing Compositional Generalization in Sequential Robot TasksNextMANGO-Grasp: Mahalanobis Fields over Geometry-Oriented 3D Gaussians for Cross-Embodiment Dexterous Grasping
Related posts
Sharp Non-Asymptotic Analysis of the Penalized Challenger in $\beta$-EB-TCI for Bernoulli Bandits
0arXiv stat.ML
Toward Optimal Switching Regret for Multi-Armed Bandits with Oblivious Adversary
0arXiv stat.ML
Spectral Condition for $\mu$P under Width-Depth Scaling
0arXiv stat.ML
A Function-Space Stability Boundary for Generalization in Interpolating Learning Systems
0arXiv stat.ML
Who Gets Watched? Allocating Scarce Escalation Resources on Pediatric Wards with Neural Index Policies
0arXiv stat.ML
Minimax Alternating Regret for the Experts Problem and Online Convex Optimization
0arXiv stat.ML