Backend
DISTA-LP: Privacy-Preserving Distributed Linear Programming for Metric Differential Privacy
arXiv cs.CR0 views
arXiv:2610.27615v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Linear-programming (LP) mechanisms for metric differential privacy (mDP) enable fine-grained, task-aware utility control, but they are computationally expensive and become privacy-fragile in distributed settings: uploading user-specific LP coefficient matrices (e.g., distance and loss blocks) to a central solver can itself leak sensitive information. We present DISTA-LP, a privacy-preserving distributed mDP optimization framework that replaces raw coefficient uploads with compact surrogate parameterizations and releases only calibrated, perturbed parameter vectors, thereby reducing both upload-stage leakage and problem dimensionality. On the server side, DISTA-LP reconstructs approximate coefficients and solves a scalable mastersubproblem formulation via Benders decomposition. To certify end-to-end privacy, we introduce a probabilistic mDP (PmDP) auditor that empirically quantifies the privacy loss induced by parameter release, allocates the required privacy budget prior to optimization, and composes it with the downstream mechanism to obtain an end-to-end mDP guarantee. Experiments on large realworld road-network datasets (Rome, New York City, and London) show that DISTA-LP achieves near-zero mDP violation rates, substantially reduces computation time compared to monolithic and hybrid baselines, and matches or improves utility, thereby demonstrating stronger upload privacy and significantly improved scalability.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.27615PreviousBig Secrets Small Shares: Revisiting Secure Multi-Party ComputationNextLocal Allow, Global Deny: Why Per-Action Authorization Does Not Compose in LLM Agents
Related posts

The Roofline Model for LLM Inference
0dev.to Machine Learning
Deduplicate Your RAG Corpus Without Losing Its Citations
0dev.to Machine Learning

scm2cpp-learn: 44 scikit-learn estimators, same results, up to ~1000x faster
0dev.to Machine Learning
Marvell is buying Lumentum for $115B: what the optical bet means for AI cluster power, and what a fixed 4.5x exchange ratio really locks in
0dev.to Machine Learning
Terminal-Bench 2.0 vs 2.1 on Hugging Face: A 2.1 Score Is Ranked First on the 2.0 Board
0dev.to Machine Learning
How to read a failed CI log: find the first real cause in under a minute
0dev.to Tutorial