AI & ML
Do Similarity Measures Measure Similarity? How User Activity Creates Phantom Correlation in Recommender Systems
arXiv cs.IR0 views
arXiv:2610.35765v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Item-item similarity is one of the oldest and most foundational signals in recommender systems: two items are assumed to be similar when the same users consume them. Despite the sparsity and scale of interaction data, the implicit assumption across the field is that item co-occurrence reflects genuine shared preference, capturing what users like together. In this paper, we demonstrate that a substantial fraction of observed item-item similarity is an artifact of variance in user activity rather than shared taste. Even if every user consumed items completely independently, differing only in their total consumption volume, standard similarity measures still detect strong associations between items. We term this phenomenon phantom correlation: spurious item association that emerges strictly from heterogeneous user activity in the complete absence of preference structure. Starting from minimal formal assumptions, we show that independent consumption under varying activity is described by a Rasch model, and we derive how the resulting association depends on item popularity for each similarity measure. By comparing our theoretical baseline against real-world benchmark datasets, we reveal the extent to which popular similarity measures reflect phantom correlation, which bears on how item co-occurrence is interpreted and used in collaborative filtering.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.35765PreviousTowards a Unified Framework of Optimal Input-Side Dimensional Configuration for Deep CTR PredictionNextACARE: Agent-Context-Aware Reranker for Iterative Search
Related posts
Why we price a developer tool per fix instead of per seat
0dev.to Productivity
My LLM-Powered Sidekick for Painless PR Descriptions
0dev.to Productivity
Reward-Adaptive Backtracking GFlowNet: A Technique Worth Understanding
0dev.to Productivity
We checked three LLM-written paper explainers against the PDFs. Two had numbers the papers never report.
0dev.to Machine Learning
Should You Rent AI or Run Your Own?
0dev.to Machine Learning
Who's hiring this week: only 1 in 30 new tech jobs is junior, and 1 in 6 'AI jobs' is AI-training work (Oct 26-Nov 1, 2026)
0dev.to Career