AI & ML
Do We Need to "Be There" to Say Goodbye? Comparing Participatory Agency and Spatial Presence Across Digital Farewell Formats
arXiv cs.HC0 views
arXiv:2610.30734v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Digitally mediated attachment is increasingly common, yet the mechanisms of symbolic closure in hybrid physical--digital relationships remain underexplored. We address an XR design question: how different mediated farewell formats relate to perceived symbolic closure, spatial presence, and bereavement-related emotional intensity. Using "cloud petting" as a controlled proxy of digitally mediated attachment, we compare three farewell formats: (1) lightweight social messaging, (2) a revisitable web memorial, and (3) immersive VR ritual participation. These formats differ in symbolic participation, spatial presence, and sensorimotor ritual enactment. In a mixed-methods study ($N=45$), Website and VR showed significantly higher perceived symbolic closure than Messaging, while the present sample did not detect a significant closure advantage for VR over Website. VR was also associated with significantly stronger grief-related responses on the Pet Bereavement Questionnaire, whereas negative-affect change measured by the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule did not differ significantly across modalities. This pattern motivates a preliminary, exploratory, mechanism-level Agency-Amplification account: formats supporting structured farewell participation were associated with higher perceived closure, whereas the VR format, combining technical immersion, spatial presence, and sensorimotor ritual enactment, was associated with stronger loss-oriented emotional processing. Because the formats also bundled differences in participation, revisitation, technical immersion, and spatial presence, the study provides preliminary design guidance without isolating the causal contribution of any single feature.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30734PreviousBig World, Little Me: Comparing a First-Person VR Walkthrough Video and Static Slides for Communicating Height-Related Accessibility BarriersNextAbstract Priorities, Concrete Rewards: How Stated Preferences Relate to What People Reward in AI Responses
Related posts

The Download: the agentic web arrives and the drive for safer roads
0MIT Technology Review

Stop counting tokens, start counting what ships
0MIT Technology Review
OpenAI is finally merging ChatGPT’s chat and Work tabs
0TechCrunch

10 Open-Source Robotics Repositories for 3D Perception, VLA Policies, and Sensor Calibration
0dev.to
My self-modifying system tried to wire a gate-passing module into its own protection enforcer. It was refused three times.
0dev.to
Last night an AI agent performed brain surgery on a mouse
0Hacker News