Backend
Don't Let One Lie Survive A Hundred Truths: A Selective Bayesian Trust Estimator for Collaborative Perception
arXiv cs.CR0 views
arXiv:2610.07875v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Collaborative perception (CP) enables connected vehicles to see beyond their own sensors but makes them dependent on messages they cannot independently verify. A compromised collaborator can surgically conceal a single safety-critical object or inject a non-existing one while correctly reporting many others. Existing Bayesian trust mechanisms pool agreement across objects, which, while effective against blatant untargeted attacks, either incurs high false-positive rates (FPR), or allows unrelated correct reports to dilute persistent attack evidence for stealthy single-object attackers. To address this problem, we propose SABER, a selective two-tier Bayesian trust estimator. The first tier maintains broad agent and object trust, preserving the ability to downweight benign but low-quality contributors. Cumulative-sum screening selects agent--object pairs with persistent omissions or unsupported reports for focused Bayesian assessment. The second tier checks these pairs against other agents' evidence and maintains a separate, reference-weighted Beta state for each. The lowest pair score constrains agent trust, preventing unrelated reports from diluting a targeted attack. We establish sufficient conditions for stronger attacker-side trust reductions with bounded additional benign false alarms at fixed thresholds. Compared with state-of-the-art CP defenses, SABER improves attack detection while reducing benign FPRs. On OPV2V, SABER improves defense ROC-AUC over MATE by up to 0.427 in late fusion and 0.337 in intermediate fusion. Against advanced intermediate-fusion data fabrication attacks, it increases detection rates over ROBOSAC and LUCIA by up to 96.40 and 67.07 percentage points, respectively, while reducing FPRs.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.07875PreviousMaximizing AI Factory Performance per Watt with NVIDIA DSX MaxLPSNextWhere does a rust speedup come from? Language and algorithm effects in sliding window threat scorer
Related posts
DeepSeek's Open-Source "Super-Agent" Codes Without Being Asked
0dev.to GitHub
All-in-one platform or a stack you assemble? Where do coaches and educators land?
0dev.to Discuss
I Wanted to Live on Coruscant. PAT Scared Me. Now My Alexa Lives on Mute.
0dev.to Discuss
Detect What You Can Name: PaliGemma 2 Object Detection with Transformers
0dev.to Machine Learning
When Should an LLM Router Stop Being Sticky? llm-d 1.0 Cache-Affinity Routing, Break-Even Math, and a Simulation
0dev.to Machine Learning

Understanding HackerTube: Karpathy’s Two-Hour Experiment in Better Recommendations
0dev.to Machine Learning