AI & ML
DynaCI: Generating GitHub Actions Workflows via Dynamic Analysis
arXiv cs.SE0 views
arXiv:2610.29890v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Continuous Integration (CI) is an essential practice that automatically validates code changes through builds and tests. However, configuring CI workflows remains challenging, as modern software often features complex architectures, numerous dependencies, and support for diverse execution environments. Most CI platforms also require workflows to be written in their particular domain-specific languages. As a result, CI workflows are often error-prone and hard to maintain, especially for those unfamiliar with CI semantics. Prior work on automated CI workflow generation require developers to create specifications that describe their intended workflows using natural language, partial workflows, etc. However, in practice, developers may struggle to articulate requirements and may be unaware of available CI features. To address these limitations, we propose DynaCI, a novel approach that uses runtime information from developers' local environments to generate CI workflows. DynaCI (i) traces the developers' local environment to collect runtime information, (ii) constructs an initial workflow by applying runtime-informed heuristics, and (iii) iteratively refines the workflow via LLM-based Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG). We evaluate DynaCI on 50 popular Python projects that use GitHub Actions, a popular CI platform, and compare it against the state-of-the-art CI workflow generation approaches: GH-WCOM and LLM4GW. DynaCI outperforms these existing approaches by more than 21.13% in BLEU score and 20.96% in F1 score on average. It also generates workflows without missing functionality in 56% of cases, while requiring fewer manual modifications to repair such exceptions. These results demonstrate that leveraging runtime information substantially improves LLM-based CI workflow generation, and offer a promising direction for broader DevOps configuration automation.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.29890PreviousPAUSE: Search-Free Steering of Coding Agents Before Their First Source-Code EditNextFaultGene: LLM-Assisted Fault-Augmented Test Generation for Hardware-in-the-Loop Validation of Autonomous Driving Systems
Related posts
Five regression tests for channel-aware AI reply drafts
0dev.to
Our smart contract scan found 14 of 20 known bugs. Recount it yourself, and see where it falls short
0dev.to
Standup amnesia: a short about forgetting what you did yesterday, and the daily note I use now
0dev.to
US boy names that became girl names and vice versa
0Hacker News
Most voted crypto projects on Coinvote, Oct 26 to Nov 1, 2026
0dev.to Data
Bluesky This Week — trending topics & AI brand mentions (2026-11-02)
0dev.to Data