Backend
EIFL: Efficiently Protecting Global Model Privacy and Integrity Against an Untrusted Server in Federated Learning
arXiv cs.CR0 views
arXiv:2610.11511v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Federated learning (FL) typically adopts a server-client architecture, where the server aggregates clients' local models (i.e., the input) and returns the aggregated global model (i.e., the output) to clients. An untrusted server may return a tampered global model to compromise the output integrity. Some existing schemes focus on verifying the output integrity. However, these schemes mostly rely on clients pre-negotiating a set of identical auxiliary information among themselves and keeping it confidential from the server. This dependency creates a verification vulnerability: if the auxiliary information is leaked, the verification method may be circumvented. Additionally, in some privacy-sensitive scenarios (e.g., commercial federated learning), the global model may need to be kept confidential from an untrusted server. However, only a few works achieve the output privacy while addressing verification vulnerability, at the cost of prohibitive computation and communication overhead. To address these challenges simultaneously, we propose a novel provably privacy-preserving FL method called EIFL. Specifically, we adopt a two-stage aggregation and combine it with symmetric encryption to protect the output privacy. To address the verification vulnerability, we propose an efficient verification method based on vector inner product for output integrity, and a random vector generation method for clients to agree on auxiliary information. EIFL innovatively binds the auxiliary information to the output integrity, and eliminates the need to keep the auxiliary information confidential from the server. Moreover, EIFL is robust against client dropout during the verification phase through a simple resending operation. Evaluation results validate the advantages of EIFL over state-of-the-art schemes in terms of computation and communication overhead.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11511PreviousA Zero-Knowledge Signature Framework for Efficient Post-Quantum Message Authentication in Cooperative Automated DrivingNextCertifying Hidden Paths: Scalable Topology Assurance for QKD Networks
Related posts

Copilot Fusion Takes Local Models, and the Offline Boundary Is Somewhere Else
0dev.to AI

A CTO Checklist for Evaluating AI Features Before Production Release
0dev.to AI
Humanoid Robot Demo Makes the Case for Keeping the Human Form
0dev.to AI
Supabase anon key vs service role key: what each one opens
0dev.to Security
After the eMudhra CA compromise: audit your own TLS stack in 30 minutes
0dev.to Security
Exposed Building Automation Services: Bavaria and DACH
0dev.to Security