Backend
Evict Early, Decode Efficiently: Lightweight Decoding Strategies for Low-Delay Sliding Window RLNC
arXiv cs.NI0 views
arXiv:2610.28097v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Random Linear Network Coding (RLNC), and in particular Sliding Window RLNC (SW-RLNC), is a promising approach for reliable, low-latency communication in dynamic environments such as 6G and non-terrestrial networks. While prior work has largely focused on encoder-side parameter tuning, such as the code rate and coding window size, decoder-side design remains comparatively underexplored despite its direct impact on end-to-end performance. This paper addresses decoding window management, namely the policies governing window-boundary updates, removal of obsolete packets, and delivery of recovered packets to upper layers, and shows that these policies critically shape the trade-off between computational complexity and decoding performance, particularly in-order delivery delay. We derive sufficient conditions under which packets can be safely removed from the decoding window without compromising decodability or violating in-order delivery guarantees, and, building on these conditions, propose two lightweight decoding window management schemes. Through extensive simulation-based evaluation across a range of channel conditions and code rates, we show that both schemes preserve decoding efficiency while substantially reducing decoding complexity, and that one additionally achieves a marked reduction in in-order delivery delay. These results establish decoding window management as a key design dimension for practical SW-RLNC systems.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.28097PreviousJoint Freshness and Deadline Feasibility in Store-and-Forward Satellite IoT NetworksNextAgentic Communication Networks: When Agents Become Network Entities
Related posts
Web Scrape API Empty Content: 3 Steps for JavaScript Pages
0dev.to JavaScript
How I built a free JPEG-to-SVG converter that runs 100% in the browser
0dev.to JavaScript
45.8s, then 12.6s: same prompt on Cloudflare Workers AI
0dev.to JavaScript

Nibnib says 4bpp. The file still has a header.
0dev.to Rust
I counted words in the same 100 MiB file with ten programs: straightforward and tuned versions in Rust, Go, Node and Python, plus two-thread Rust and Go. Read the full article : https://medium.com/git
0dev.to Rust
Redis 8.12 RC2's SEXPIRE command cuts a set membership check from two round trips to one
0dev.to Database