Backend
Extending Sample-based Quantum Diagonalization to Systems of Linear Equations
arXiv cs.NA0 views
arXiv:2610.41708v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Solving systems of linear equations, $Ax=b$, is a ubiquitous task in computational science. The Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd algorithm requires phase estimation, controlled rotations, and post-selection, impractical on noisy intermediate-scale quantum hardware. We extend sample-based quantum diagonalization (SQD), developed for quantum chemistry, to linear systems. Following the sample-based Krylov variant, the Hermitian matrix $A$ is decomposed in the Pauli basis, the Trotterized time evolution of $|b\rangle$ is sampled at several times to select computational-basis configurations, and the system is solved classically by a Galerkin projection onto the selected subspace. We prove that the subspace solution is exact when the sampled configurations contain the Krylov support of $b$ and optimal in the energy norm for symmetric positive-definite matrices, so that noise-induced configurations cannot degrade it as long as they do not displace the ideal ones. On IBM Quantum hardware, the sampled distribution of a $4\times4$ example deviates from the exact one by eleven times the shot-noise level, yet the solution is recovered exactly. For a localized problem of dimension $N=1024$, SQD selects 33 configurations, reaches a relative error of $10^{-5}$, and its truncated subspaces coincide with the optimal choice; readout errors enlarge the subspace without degrading the accuracy. The tests also show the limitations: the selected subspace coincides with that of inexpensive classical selection, banded matrices require exponentially many Pauli terms in the binary encoding, and Trotter errors populate spurious configurations unless the circuits are deep. An MIT-licensed Python package and notebooks that reproduce the numerical results are provided.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41708PreviousOn reduced SPDE models for stochastic Cucker-Smale flocking dynamicsNextNumerical evaluation of one-loop integrals using quadrature rules
Related posts
The Building Is a System: What Software Engineers Can Learn from Construction Site Failures
0dev.to

Part 4: When the Screen Changes Silently: Live Regions, Headings and Focus in Compose
0dev.to
FlatCake: Why Tiered KV Cache Storage Is Holding LLM Serving Back
0dev.to
Why Scrum is Not a Silver Bullet: 5 Structural Drawbacks and Fixes
0dev.to
Agentic Frameworks Compared: LangGraph, CrewAI & More
0dev.to
The Real-World Pain
0dev.to