Backend
Geometric Identification and Consistent Estimation of Source Apportionment with Application to Greenland Summit Aerosols
arXiv stat.TH0 views
arXiv:2510.03616v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Source apportionment, the attribution of observed multipollutant concentrations to underlying sources, can be cast as a non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) problem. Because NMF is non-unique, source apportionment imposes often unverifiable constraints such as structural sparsity or rotational tuning based on scientific knowledge, which may not be available in newer geographies or new sensor technology. Geometric NMF approaches offer a more data-driven route to identification, but many still rely on source profiles with arbitrary scalings, assume exact separability, and lack a framework for consistent estimation. We address these limitations by formally establishing statistical identifiability of the source apportionment matrix under a stochastic framework that replaces hard separability with soft probabilistic relaxations. We then present a scalable geometric algorithm to estimate this matrix and prove its consistency, to our knowledge the first such result requiring no exact sparsity, no parametric distributional assumptions, and accommodating spatio-temporal dependence. We apply this method in a setting where prior knowledge of sources is limited, so structural assumptions are challenging to impose. Over the last four decades, the Arctic has warmed four times faster than the rest of the planet, with anthropogenic aerosols among the major forcings. Greenland Summit Station has collected size-resolved particulate matter year-round since 2003, yet these records remain underutilized. Analyzing the 2003--2016 record with geometric NMF and HYSPLIT trajectories, we characterize long-range transport of anthropogenic and natural species into the Arctic.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.03616PreviousExact bounds on the distribution function of isotropic log-concave distributionsNextKernel Estimation Of Chatterjee's Dependence Coefficient
Related posts
The Building Is a System: What Software Engineers Can Learn from Construction Site Failures
0dev.to

Part 4: When the Screen Changes Silently: Live Regions, Headings and Focus in Compose
0dev.to
FlatCake: Why Tiered KV Cache Storage Is Holding LLM Serving Back
0dev.to
Why Scrum is Not a Silver Bullet: 5 Structural Drawbacks and Fixes
0dev.to
Agentic Frameworks Compared: LangGraph, CrewAI & More
0dev.to
The Real-World Pain
0dev.to