AI & ML
GraphRAGProv: GraphRAG Meets How-Provenance
arXiv cs.DB0 views
arXiv:2610.37237v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: GraphRAG systems often use knowledge graphs to retrieve relevant context for an LLM that produces the final answer. That makes answers more inscrutable and therefore less appealing for domains where transparency is paramount. We present GraphRAGProv, an architecture that executes SPARQL queries over source-grounded RDF graphs to compute answers and their how-provenance polynomials. These polynomials record which statement occurrences were used and how they were combined. Because each occurrence is linked to its source text, users can follow these links to check whether the extracted statements reflect the text and whether the query combines them to answer the question. Querying thereby becomes a way to inspect and evaluate the text-to-graph transformation. Our interactive demo examines 400 cases from two multi-hop QA benchmarks, revealing extraction and query errors even when the final answer is correct.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37237PreviousTaming Multi-Dimensional Skew in Sparse Matrix Multiplication with Contention-Aware Scheduling [Technical Report]NextConstraining the Commit Boundary: A DIO/ODI-Informed Authorization Guardrail for Agentic Entity Resolution
Related posts

Behavioral Design Unpacked: Nudges, Funnels & Persuasion | UX Unpacked #3
0dev.to UX
National Grid buys Teesside land for UK largest substation to power AI data center
0dev.to News

Leonardo AI Alternative in 2026
0dev.to Discuss

This is my first HacktoberFest, and I don't know what to feel.
0dev.to Discuss

12% of the Economy: The Benchmark That Grades AI Agents Like Employees
0dev.to Machine Learning
A headline said the CMB killed huge black holes. I read the two papers.
0dev.to Career