Backend
LEO Constellation Analysis for Satellite IoT: An Analysis of Coverage Gaps and Retransmissions
arXiv math.IT0 views
arXiv:2610.41440v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Low Earth Orbit (LEO) constellations are a promising way to connect Internet of Things (IoT) devices beyond terrestrial coverage, yet the intermittent visibility of their satellites imposes hard constraints on system and protocol design. Coverage probability and other snapshot statistics, which are often computed without accounting for the terminal's latitude, are insufficient for this purpose. Designers also need the temporal structure of coverage: the rate of coverage gaps, their duration distribution and mean, and quantities such as the probability that a retransmission succeeds after an initial transmission has failed. We develop an ergodic framework for Walker Star constellations in which these quantities reduce to spatial integrals over a two-dimensional torus that can be evaluated efficiently. We validate the framework against a seven-day Simplified General Perturbations 4 (SGP4) simulation of the Iridium NEXT constellation and find close agreement for the coverage probability, the revisit-time distribution, and the retransmission success probability. A comparison of Walker Star configurations further shows that constellations with similar satellite counts can yield substantially different packet-delivery probabilities with at most one retransmission, depending on the number of orbital planes. The results show that the ergodic model accurately gives the long-run values that finite time-domain simulations can only approximate, providing researchers with a tractable basis for the analytical modelling of IoT connectivity over non-terrestrial networks (NTN).
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.41440PreviousScaled-Gradient Hard Thresholding Algorithms for Sparse Signal RecoveryNextSecure Deterministic Identification with Feedback and Sensing over State-Dependent Wiretap Channels
Related posts

Choosing the right AI web scraper depends on your needs, budget, and technical skills. This guide makes comparing the top tools easier and helps you find the right fit for your next project.
0dev.to Discuss

Choosing the right AI web scraper depends on your needs, budget, and technical skills. This comparison makes it easier to understand which tools are worth trying, from no-code options to developer-foc
0dev.to Discuss
Is It Safe to Use AI for LinkedIn Messages? What to Know
0dev.to Career

Amazon Interview Prep: What Happened After You Lost the Argument?
0dev.to Career
UI tests that stayed green on a broken app, and what it took to make them fail
0dev.to Testing

Part 3: Green Builds, Blind Spots: Testing Compose Accessibility Layer by Layer
0dev.to Testing