AI & ML
LGNO: A Local-Global Neural Operator for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws
arXiv cs.NA0 views
arXiv:2606.18221v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Solutions of hyperbolic conservation laws exhibit both smooth structures across large scales and sharp localized features such as shocks and contact discontinuities, making them difficult to approximate accurately with existing neural operators. The Fourier Neural Operator (FNO) captures long-range interactions well but tends to smear localized structures through excessive numerical dissipation. To address this, we propose a Local-Global Neural Operator (LGNO) that learns a one-step discrete flow map by combining a global FNO branch for representing smooth dynamics at large scales with a local multiresolution branch for enhancing localized discontinuities and nonsmooth features. The model is trained with a one-step loss that combines a physical space prediction term and a spectral penalty on high frequencies to suppress spurious oscillations near steep fronts. On a large collection of benchmarks in one and two dimensions, LGNO consistently outperforms FNO baselines with matched parameter counts, reducing one-step errors by factors of 2-5 and remaining significantly more accurate over long autoregressive rollouts. Most strikingly, although it is trained only on short-time data from a high-order WENO-Z scheme, the long-time rollout of LGNO on a coarse $256^2$ grid exhibits lower numerical dissipation than the same WENO-Z scheme run on a finer $512^2$ grid, while being orders of magnitude cheaper to evaluate. These results suggest that, with an appropriate architecture and training objective, learned operators can effectively learn discrete flow maps. They further suggest that such learned operators have the potential to control long-time numerical dissipation better than the conventional shock-capturing schemes that generate the training data.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.18221PreviousStatistical comparison of reconstruction methods for the inverse boundary problem of the one-dimensional wave equationNextOptimal Polynomial Tractability Exponents for the Inverse Star Discrepancy
Related posts
Most voted crypto projects on Coinvote, Oct 26 to Nov 1, 2026
0dev.to Data
Bluesky This Week — trending topics & AI brand mentions (2026-11-02)
0dev.to Data
Gemini 4 Carbon e DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Cyber: a Guerra Cibernética Autônoma e o Topo do Artificial Analysis
0dev.to Machine Learning
What can an AI agent do for you every day?
0dev.to Machine Learning
Mon modèle de paris semblait excellent sur 3 671 prédictions. Il n'a jamais battu le bookmaker.
0dev.to Machine Learning
HR manager LinkedIn About section examples you can adapt
0dev.to Career