AI & ML
Measuring the Verifier's Floor: How Much Apparent Rare-Word Text-to-Speech Error Is ASR Error?
arXiv cs.SD0 views
arXiv:2610.31470v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Text-to-speech (TTS) is usually evaluated by transcribing its output with an automatic speech recognition (ASR) system, so the word error rate also counts recognizer errors. We measure these errors on human recordings of the test sentences. On LibriSpeech and FLEURS, the evaluation recognizer misses 33-67% of very rare words even in human speech, and all three recognizers miss 22-42%. Checking every word with two more recognizer families lowers the apparent TTS error on words that at least one recognizer hears two- to three-fold (very rare LibriSpeech words: from 10-13% to 3-5%), yet very rare words remain the hardest. Ignoring words the recognizer misses in human speech is biased: the other recognizers find TTS errors far more often on these words (4-6% vs. 0.2-0.3%) and overturn about half of the errors this mask keeps. As half of the remaining adjudicated errors may be spelling variants, a listening test is needed.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31470PreviousFrom Signals to Evidence: Interpretable Underwater Acoustic Target Sensing with Large Language Models - Part II: Passive DetectionNextAGF-Net: A Robust Multimodal Emotion Recognition Model for Asynchronous Audio-Visual Signals Based on Predictive Dynamic Fusion with Negative Learning
Related posts

Build World Models for Interactive Simulation with NVIDIA Cosmos
0NVIDIA Developer Blog
Seeing and Imagining as One: Unified Video Generation and 4D Perception for Embodied World Modeling
0arXiv cs.RO
Shared Modular Recurrence in Contextual MDPs for Universal Morphology Control
0arXiv cs.RO
BeeTalk 群主必备:AI 群管机器人 AIGB 免费解决垃圾信息问题
0dev.to AI
I Open-Sourced a Free YouTube Shorts Factory. The Money Isn't in the Shorts.
0dev.to AI
Priced per TB/s, the H200 beats the H100 at 6 of 7 providers
0dev.to Python