Database
Monus vs. Interpretations in Semiring Semantics
arXiv cs.DB0 views
arXiv:2611.08474v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Interpretations have been widely used in the study of provenance of queries on semiring-annotated databases. Here, we consider two different interpretation-based semantics for first-order formulas in negation normal form, namely, the canonical-interpretation semantics and the compatible-interpretation semantics. We show that the resulting query languages cannot express the monus operation on semiring-annotated relations, when the annotations come from the bag semiring or the tropical semiring or the fuzzy semiring. Consequently, the semantics of SQL cannot be captured using the interpretation-based semantics considered here.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08474PreviousCascadeFilter: Cost-Efficient Semantic Filtering with Joint Threshold SelectionNextTyped Knowledge over Constructive Institutions
Related posts
What Happens When Your Team Adds Azure to AWS and GCP
0dev.to
A Cyber Range Evaluation of Inductive Autonomous Network Incident Response Agents
0arXiv cs.CR

What is your role in your agentic setup?
0dev.to WebDev
NestJS Rate Limiting: In-Memory vs Redis vs Postgres
0dev.to Security
I checked 14 free cloud hosting platforms against their own pricing pages. 8 need no card.
0dev.to DevOps

Two Futures of AI-Powered BI: Dashboard + AI Agent vs. Agent-First
0dev.to