AI & ML
Mutual-Coupling-Aware Electromagnetic and Signal Processing Co-Design for Pixel Antenna Arrays
arXiv eess.SP0 views
arXiv:2610.08550v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reconfigurable pixel antenna arrays provide additional electromagnetic (EM) degrees of freedom for wireless transmission by enabling hardware-level adaptation of radiation responses. In practical arrays, inter-element mutual coupling (MC) alters the switch-state-dependent responses, causing MC-unaware designs to be mismatched with the realized coupled-array channels. To address this issue, we propose an MC-aware EM and signal-processing co-design framework for downlink multi-user multiple-input single-output (MU-MISO) systems. The full pixel antenna array is modeled as a unified multi-port circuit network that jointly characterizes the feed ports and switch-controlled pixel ports. By combining the impedance matrix extracted from Computer Simulation Technology (CST) Studio Suite simulations with the full-array open-circuit far-field responses, we construct a switch-state-dependent EM-domain channel that explicitly captures both intra-antenna pixel coupling and inter-element MC. Based on this model, we formulate a sum-rate maximization problem over the binary switch-state vector and the transmit precoder. To address the resulting mixed-integer non-convex problem, we develop an alternating optimization algorithm in which the binary switch-state vector is updated via sequential exhaustive block optimization (SEBO), while the transmit precoder is optimized using fractional programming (FP). CST-based simulations show that the proposed MC-aware design outperforms MC-unaware, MC-free, and conventional patch-array baselines. These results demonstrate that accurate MC modeling is essential not only for reducing model mismatch, but also for exploiting the coupled embedded responses of practical pixel antenna arrays.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.08550PreviousJoint EM-BB Beamforming Design for ISAC Systems With Reconfigurable Antenna ArraysNextFundamental CRB-Rate Tradeoff of Rydberg Atomic Receivers for Integrated Sensing and Communication
Related posts
How to spend three slow days in a city you have never visited
0dev.to Productivity
Cursor usage limits: the weekly pool, legacy plans and when they reset
0dev.to Productivity
How to Turn a Process Document Into a Working App With AI
0dev.to Machine Learning
Which AI subscription should I buy?
0dev.to Machine Learning
Your Classifier Says 0.97. Six Ways That Number Lies in .NET 10
0dev.to Machine Learning
Which AI song generator fits a lyrics-first workflow?
0dev.to Tutorial