AI & ML
Neural Operators Which Certifiably Simultaneously Solve Infinitely Many Convex Programs using Logarithmic Rank and Linear Complexity
arXiv cs.NA0 views
arXiv:2508.14995v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Neural operators (NOs) are a class of deep learning models designed to simultaneously solve infinitely many related problems by casting them into an infinite-dimensional space, whereon these NOs operate. Such operator learning problems arise naturally in mathematical finance, for instance, when learning families of optimal portfolios or hedging strategies. Two significant gaps, however, remain between theory and practice: 1) most universal approximation guarantees do not describe practically implementable NOs or are pure existence statements; and 2) worst-case parameter bounds from universal approximation theorems suggest that constructed NOs may require an unrealistically large number of parameters to solve most operator learning problems, which stands in direct opposition to a slew of experimental evidence. This paper closes these gaps by exhibiting a short and simple training algorithm to construct a specific class of NOs, proximal equilibrium operators (PEOs), using (realistic) finite-dimensional deep equilibrium layers to solve families of convex optimization problems over a separable Hilbert space $X$. Here, the inputs are smooth, convex loss functions on $X$, and the outputs are the associated (approximate) solutions to the optimization problems defined by each input loss. Our main result is a certificate showing that, when the input losses lie in a suitable infinite-dimensional set, our PEOs trained with our algorithm do in fact uniformly approximate the corresponding solutions to arbitrary precision, with rank and width growing only logarithmically and the depth growing linearly in the reciprocal of the approximation error. We then validate both our theoretical results and the trainability of PEOs on three applications: non-linear PDEs, stochastic optimal control, and portfolio optimization and hedging problems in mathematical finance.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.14995PreviousLatent Evolution Operator (LEO): State-to-State Forecasting of Parametric PDEsNextActive-Set Identification in Noisy and Stochastic Optimization
Related posts

Here’s how to listen live to Apple’s Q4 2026 earnings call
09to5Mac
Can AI Write CAD? Testing LLM-Generated 3D Models for Manufacturability
0HackerNoon
Guardz Integrates Palo Alto Networks Prisma Browser Protection to Address Growing Workspace Security
0HackerNoon

LinearB Launches Agentic Studio to Steer AI Coding Agents in a $127 Billion Market by 2032
0HackerNoon
We Built a Test to Catch Contact Forms That Lie. It Lied to Us Five Times First
0HackerNoon

The TechBeat: Why Knowledge Graphs and Ontologies Are Making a Comeback in the Age of AI (11/2/2026)
0HackerNoon