AI & ML
Patients With Personality: Realistic Patient Simulation through Controlled Diversity and Selective Disclosure
arXiv cs.HC0 views
arXiv:2606.17441v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Realistic patient simulation is a key requirement for developing and testing clinical LLMs at scale without costly user studies. Existing simulators lack realism and controllability: they overshare information and miss the variability of real patient behavior. Here, we introduce PatientsWithPersonality (PWP), a patient simulation framework that generates realistic yet diverse patient responses through explicit personality parametrization over a latent patient state. Grounded in the six-dimensional HEXACO personality model, it gives fine-grained control over conversational style, cooperativeness, and information disclosure. We evaluate PWP in the first direct comparison of different patient simulators under a shared protocol, anchored in transcripts of real physician-patient encounters. Clinicians judge PWP conversations as realistic at least as often as the recorded encounters themselves and far more often than prior simulators, and almost never flag them as "too informative". Our simulator also reproduces the disclosure pacing of real patients, and its HEXACO-conditioned personality traits can be recovered by clinicians and an autorater. PWP further shows a substantially wider behavioral range than the closest baseline. In a downstream benchmark, LLMs interviewing patients simulated by PWP perform closest to how they perform on the real encounters, whereas prior simulators make the task easier. PWP thus provides a realistic, steerable, and diverse patient population for improving and benchmarking clinical LLMs.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.17441PreviousRethinking the UI of GenUI: A Tale of Two DesignsNextMAIA: Multi-Agent Intent Articulation for Requirement Discovery in Art Commissions
Related posts
Auditing what an agent says it did, using its log
0dev.to Testing
Testing LIMS Software for Pharmaceutical Compliance: A Practical Guide
0dev.to Testing
Not every model makes a good attacker: OpenAI vs DeepSeek for red-teaming
0dev.to Testing
Testing AI meeting notes with one changed deadline and one missing owner
0dev.to Testing

Best ChatGPT Alternatives That Run Entirely on Your Own Device in 2026 (Free, No Account)
0dev.to OpenSource

Best Private Local AI App for Mac and Windows in 2026 (Runs on Your Computer and Remembers Your Work)
0dev.to OpenSource