AI & ML
ProximalFM: Amortized Proximal Causal Inference under Hidden Confounding
arXiv stat.ML0 views
arXiv:2610.08078v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Standard causal identification methods often assume no unmeasured confounding and can fail when relevant confounders are unobserved. Proximal causal inference instead uses proxy variables to identify effects under hidden confounding. However, nonparametric proximal estimation can be challenging in practice: recovering causal estimands such as the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) requires solving an ill-posed integral equation that is data-hungry, hyperparameter-sensitive, and optimization-unstable. Bayesian inference for such models provides a desirable alternative, mitigating these difficulties by regularizing through the prior. However, computing a posterior is itself challenging, as a typical likelihood function will include latent variables. Following the recent success of tabular foundation models in backdoor, instrumental variable, and frontdoor settings, we propose that prior-data fitted networks (PFNs) are uniquely suited to resolve this bottleneck. Indeed, by training on synthetic data sampled from compliant structural causal models with access to oracle counterfactuals, we simplify the task substantially, amortizing the implied Bayesian operator inversion into a single transformer forward pass. Compared to prior literature that focuses primarily on point estimation, our model, ProximalFM, explicitly targets the Bayesian posterior distribution of the CATE. One unique aspect of this problem is that we need to provide Monte Carlo estimates of the oracle CATEs, leading to a novel variation of PFNs that accounts for the added stochastic error. Across a diverse suite of proximal regimes, ProximalFM achieves consistently strong CATE-estimation performance without dataset-specific tuning, with its largest advantage when latent confounding is substantial and the proxies are weakly informative; it also provides fast inference through a single amortized forward pass.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.08078PreviousStochastic Gradient Descent Ascent is Suboptimal for Nonconvex-PL Min-Max GamesNextAnytime-valid simulation-based hypothesis testing
Related posts
Most voted crypto projects on Coinvote, Oct 26 to Nov 1, 2026
0dev.to Data
Bluesky This Week — trending topics & AI brand mentions (2026-11-02)
0dev.to Data
Gemini 4 Carbon e DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Cyber: a Guerra Cibernética Autônoma e o Topo do Artificial Analysis
0dev.to Machine Learning
What can an AI agent do for you every day?
0dev.to Machine Learning
Mon modèle de paris semblait excellent sur 3 671 prédictions. Il n'a jamais battu le bookmaker.
0dev.to Machine Learning
HR manager LinkedIn About section examples you can adapt
0dev.to Career