Open Source
$R^2$-WAM: Repair-and-Reject Post-Training for World Action Models
arXiv cs.RO0 views
arXiv:2610.04913v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: World Action Models (WAMs) emerge as a promising foundation for policy refinement by predicting the consequences of sampled actions. However, visually plausible predictions can mislead policy refinement if they fail to reflect the input actions. To address this mismatch, we introduce $R^2$-WAM, a two-stage repair-and-reject post-training framework that first improves the consistency of predicted futures with input actions, then uses these futures to select inferior action samples for negative fine-tuning. The repair stage grounds imagination in observed robot behavior through a kinematic alignment score that measures agreement between predicted and demonstrated motion, enabling the predicted video to faithfully reflect its input actions. Using the repaired video model, the rejection stage compares imagined outcomes of sampled and demonstrated actions, selectively applying negative fine-tuning to samples whose predicted task progress falls below the demonstrated reference by a prescribed margin. Together, the two stages extend video prediction from representation learning to consequence-based policy refinement without additional environment interaction or changes to the inference procedure. $R^2$-WAM achieves 93.8% average success on RoboTwin 2.0 across clean and randomized settings. On the long-horizon real-world Fold Shirt task, it achieves 87.5% average success, compared with 0% for Fast-WAM. Our project page is available at https://r2-wam.github.io/.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.04913PreviousRoboIRS: Inference-Time Internal Representation Steering for Generalist Robot PoliciesNextBenchmarking Generative Trajectory Models for Active-Inference Control
Related posts
A fresh wave of cyberattacks has hit Europe’s supermarket refrigerators, destroying food across countries
0TechCrunch

Onboarding Instrumentation: What to Actually Log Before You Redesign the Flow
0dev.to UX
Iceberg vs Parquet: do you need a table format?
0dev.to Data

Open Source Didn't Ban AI Code. 83% of Its AI Policies Allow It, With One Catch
0dev.to Git
Orbit: A High-Performance Terminal Workspace & System Monitor in Rust with WASM Plugins
0dev.to Rust

Forecasting the U.S. Senate with Prediction Markets and Monte Carlo Simulations
0dev.to AI