AI & ML
Robust LLM Watermarking with Minimal Semantic Distortion for IP Protection
arXiv cs.CR0 views
arXiv:2605.23175v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Proprietary large language models (LLMs) face risks of intellectual property (IP) violation, as adversaries can replicate an LLM by collecting input-output pairs to train a surrogate model, causing financial setbacks. Watermarks offer a promising defense to verify ownership, but existing methods often struggle with semantic distortion, factual inconsistency, and adversarial attacks. In addition, key-conditioned watermarks for provider-specific detection, especially in cross-provider and multi-user scenarios, remain largely underexplored. To address these challenges, we propose SAFESEAL, a novel key-conditioned watermarking framework that achieves strong detectability with minimal impact on model utility, effectively balancing detectability, utility, and robustness. SAFESEAL preserves named entities while substituting linguistic terms with context-aware synonyms through a key-conditioned Tournament sampling mechanism, maintaining semantic fidelity and factual consistency. For detection, we introduce a key-conditioned contrastive detector that jointly encodes the text and key, enabling provider-specific and robust watermark verification. We derive theoretical bounds on the utility-detectability trade-off and significantly reduce latency through lightweight models, batching, and parallelism. Extensive experiments show that SAFESEAL outperforms baselines in utility, detectability, and robustness, achieving a BERTScore of 0.983, entity similarity of 0.963, a 98.2% detection rate, and the highest human ratings for text quality and content preservation, with latency comparable to the fastest baseline. To promote transparency and community-driven progress, we release the first public watermark leaderboard and an interactive demo.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.23175PreviousPost-quantum commutative group actions from oriented superspecial abelian varietiesNextResilient Liquid Democracy: Mitigating Voting Power Imbalances via Secure Delegation Networks
Related posts
LifeVal
0OpenAI Blog
Claude’s new rules against game cloning won’t stop the AI copying boom
0Ars Technica

OpenAI pitches data center power plants as a way to protect nearby areas
0The Verge

Anthropic clamps down on Claude’s AI video game clones
0The Verge
Readwise takes on Amazon’s Kindle and Goodreads with its new app for book lovers
0TechCrunch
Five regression tests for channel-aware AI reply drafts
0dev.to