Frontend
Sharp minimax risks and phase transitions in sparse submatrix detection
arXiv stat.TH0 views
arXiv:2605.31583v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: In this paper, we study the minimax risk of detecting a sparse, elevated-mean Gaussian submatrix planted in a larger noisy matrix. When the planted submatrix has size $n\times n$ and the ambient matrix has size $N\times N$ with $N=n^{1+\alpha}$, the seminal work of Butucea and Ingster (2013) identifies the sharp detection boundary around which the risk converges to $0$ or $1$. We extend that zero-one theory by determining sharp risk asymptotics throughout a two-parameter phase diagram. Above the boundary, the risk decays stretched- or super-exponentially fast, and we determine its precise exponent. Below the boundary, where the risk tends to $1$, we obtain matching absolute-constant bounds for its polynomial rate of convergence. In both regimes, the asymptotics change across the line $\alpha+\delta=1/2$, where $\delta$ parametrizes the signed distance from the detection boundary. Finally, on the boundary, we show that the minimax risk converges to the nondegenerate constant $\frac12$ in a very sparse regime where $n$ remains fixed and $N\to\infty$. Each of these rates corresponds to the risk of a suitably calibrated scan or sum test, whence follow the upper bounds. The main problem is to derive the matching regime-specific lower bounds. The mixture likelihood ratio is an average rather than a product and thus its logarithm lacks the additive structure required by standard large deviation formulations. On the other hand, classical second-moment estimates fail to be sharp due to overlap-induced correlations. To address these issues, we develop two general lower-bound principles based on truncated mixture likelihoods, tailored to the target risks on both sides of the detection boundary. The same framework yields sharp risk asymptotics for sparse subtensors with equal side lengths and also applies to more general testing problems including the detection of rectangular subtensors.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.31583PreviousWasserstein convergence rates for empirical measures of point processesNextAsymptotic Bayes Optimality Under Sparsity of the Gavrilov-Benjamini-Sarkar Step-Down Testing Procedure
Related posts

Render Personalized Images from One Editable Template with ModelFold Studio
0dev.to Design

A booking request form for a static Next.js site (no backend, no form service)
0dev.to Design

One treatment plan, three components: sharing state on a static Next.js site
0dev.to Design
Trace-X, image forensics
0dev.to Machine Learning
Building a Fajr alarm that keeps ringing until you're up: AlarmKit, backup rings and an on-device prayer mat check
0dev.to Machine Learning
Is a Salesforce certification enough to hire someone? Five signals I look for instead
0dev.to Career