Backend
TANDEM: Balancing Centralized and Decentralized Critics to Address the Information Gap in Complex Multi-Agent Environments
arXiv cs.MA0 views
arXiv:2610.37592v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning under centralized training with decentralized execution (CTDE) shapes decentralized policies with a centralized critic that observes the global state, then removes the critic at execution. The policies are optimized to rely on information they will not have when they act, an information gap between training and execution. It widens under partial observability, observation noise, and openness, where the set of agents and tasks present changes during an episode. Existing methods transfer centralized guidance in one direction only, removing or distilling the critic once, so the policies never rehearse acting without the critic while they can still be corrected. We propose TANDEM, which keeps one centralized critic and reads it two ways at each training step: a centralized read from the global state, and a decentralized read restricted to the information each agent will have at execution. A parameter-free gate compares the two reads for each agent and trains the policy on the decentralized read where they agree, reinstating the centralized read only where the local view is misleading. A shared target pulls the decentralized read toward the centralized one. We formalize the setting as a task- and agent-open decentralized partially observable Markov decision process (TAO-Dec-POMDP) and evaluate TANDEM on three cooperative domains, each isolating one form of the information gap: discovery for partial observability, sampling for observation noise, and openness in wildfire suppression. We compare against six CTDE baselines and ablate the gate and the shared target; the supplementary material holds the full variant sweep, diagnostics, and learning curves. We measure return at execution, once the centralized critic is removed. TANDEM is the best method on eight of the nine setups and never significantly worse than any baseline.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.37592PreviousStrategyproof Deep Reinforcement Learning for Online Resource AllocationNextOntology-guided multi-agent reasoning for explainable differential diagnosis
Related posts

Copilot Fusion Takes Local Models, and the Offline Boundary Is Somewhere Else
0dev.to AI

A CTO Checklist for Evaluating AI Features Before Production Release
0dev.to AI
Humanoid Robot Demo Makes the Case for Keeping the Human Form
0dev.to AI
Supabase anon key vs service role key: what each one opens
0dev.to Security
After the eMudhra CA compromise: audit your own TLS stack in 30 minutes
0dev.to Security
Exposed Building Automation Services: Bavaria and DACH
0dev.to Security