Backend
The Content Leash: Mitigating Degenerate Solutions in Invertible Speaker Anonymization
arXiv cs.CR0 views
arXiv:2610.36768v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Voice anonymization aims to protect a speaker's identity while preserving the linguistic content of speech, enabling voice data to be shared and processed with reduced privacy risk. This work focuses on reversible voice anonymization, where the original voice can be recovered by an authorized user rather than being permanently discarded. However, existing approaches can achieve apparent speaker anonymization by degrading the speech itself, while their effectiveness may also depend on the speaker-verification representation used during training. This creates a need for methods that protect speaker identity without sacrificing speech intelligibility and that remain effective against unseen speaker verifiers. We introduce content preserving training constraints to improve the privacy-utility trade-off by preventing anonymization from being achieved primarily through speech degradation. We further introduce a verifier-generalization strategy that incorporates a stronger speaker-verification representation during training, improving anonymization robustness beyond the verifier used in the original training setup. The resulting approach maintains intelligible speech, strengthens anonymization, and preserves reliable voice restoration, with evaluation on unseen speakers and held-out speaker verification models. On 38 unseen speakers, the approach raises the attacker's equal error rate from a measured floor of 2.8% to 26.3%, and to 27.9% against a held-out verifier, with 11.8% word error rate and 94.9% speaker similarity on key-based restoration. These improvements advance reversible voice anonymization toward practical privacy-preserving speech applications, where anonymized speech can be safely processed or shared while the original voice remains recoverable under authorized conditions.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36768PreviousHaste Makes Waste? Towards Safe Few-Step Text-to-Image ModelsNextRePAIR: Inverting Backdoor Attacks in Semantic Segmentation
Related posts
Is It Safe to Use AI for LinkedIn Messages? What to Know
0dev.to Career

Amazon Interview Prep: What Happened After You Lost the Argument?
0dev.to Career
UI tests that stayed green on a broken app, and what it took to make them fail
0dev.to Testing

Part 3: Green Builds, Blind Spots: Testing Compose Accessibility Layer by Layer
0dev.to Testing
How I test local TTS on a Mac before it reads a book
0dev.to Testing

11 Best Vibe Coding Tools Compared, From No-Code Builders to Terminal Agents
0dev.to Programming