AI & ML
Towards Sustainable Federated Learning via Carbon-Aware Client Selection
arXiv cs.DC0 views
arXiv:2611.09552v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The Information/Communication Technology (ICT) industry is severely challenging the global environment due to the sharply rising carbon emissions generated by machine learning (ML) workloads. Federated Learning (FL) is one of the prominent distributed ML systems used in applications with billions of client devices, such as Google Gboard and Apple Siri. Nearly half of the total carbon footprint in FL originates from client-side computation during local training. However, existing client selection strategies in FL primarily focus on minimizing energy consumption rather than carbon emissions, despite the fact that carbon impact depends not only on computational load but also on the underlying carbon intensity of the energy source. In this paper, we address this gap by proposing a carbon-aware fair client selection strategy (CA-FCS) designed to minimize the carbon emissions associated with model training on client devices. In contrast to existing approaches for reducing carbon emissions in FL, we incorporate hourly carbon intensity and a realistic energy consumption model developed using empirical measurements from Google Pixel smartphones to estimate client-side carbon emissions in FL. Since repeatedly selecting low-carbon clients may reduce data diversity and degrade global model performance, particularly under non-independent and identically distributed (non-IID) data settings, CA-FCS incorporates fairness into client selection to mitigate this issue. We conduct extensive experiments under realistic FL settings for mobile devices, where client participation is constrained by device availability conditions, such as charging status and Wi-Fi connectivity. The results demonstrate that our method reduces client-side carbon emissions by up to 46% while maintaining competitive model accuracy.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.09552PreviousNebula: Distributed Position-Independent Caching for LLM ServingNextFast and Actionable Classification of HPC I/O Time Series
Related posts
W-2 vs 1099 Calculator: A Worked Offer Comparison for 2026
0dev.to

I tested ChatGPT's PDF Content Credentials: what survives a re-save, a print and an edit
0dev.to
I Built ResearchLens AI to Make Data Exploration and ML Benchmarking Easier
0dev.to
Fold Epic Paper Airplanes
0Hacker News
The Midterms Were a Pretty Good Sign for the Right-to-Repair Movement
0Wired
New Hulu Doc ‘Get Huge’ Shows the Deadly Toll of Looksmaxxing
0Wired