AI & ML
Transfer Learning for Rhythm Game Chart Generation from Music Transcription and Across Games
arXiv cs.SD0 views
arXiv:2610.14955v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Rhythm games ask the player to act in time with a recording, following a chart: a sequence of actions, each with a time and, depending on the game, a lane, type, or playfield position. Charts are hand-written per recording and difficulty. Automatic generation from audio has been studied with pipeline and end-to-end approaches, and recent work reuses pre-trained audio encoders, but never compares them with one trained from scratch. None of these targets automatic music transcription (AMT), yet most chart times are note onsets, which AMT models locate. We freeze a pre-trained audio encoder, an AMT model in particular, and train only a linear projection and a Transformer decoder on charts. With MuScriptor, this fits human charts more closely than encoders trained from scratch and places more accurate note types than MERT, a music encoder pre-trained without transcription labels. Joint training on three osu! modes raises event F1 on the mode with the fewest charts from 0.492 to 0.506, while charts from Clone Hero, similar in layout, lower it to 0.482. Transfer between games thus appears to depend on charting style and the music covered.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.14955PreviousExplore This! Beat and Downbeat Tracking From a Learned Tatum GridNextLearning Where to Split: Dynamic Band Splitting for Audio Source Separation
Related posts
Your AI agent got an HTTP error. Should it retry?
0dev.to Discuss
Is AI dangerous, or just misunderstood?
0dev.to Discuss
Why we price a developer tool per fix instead of per seat
0dev.to Productivity
My LLM-Powered Sidekick for Painless PR Descriptions
0dev.to Productivity
Reward-Adaptive Backtracking GFlowNet: A Technique Worth Understanding
0dev.to Productivity
We checked three LLM-written paper explainers against the PDFs. Two had numbers the papers never report.
0dev.to Machine Learning