AI & ML
Understanding Tool-Mediated Interaction Failures in Agentic GUI Software: An Empirical Study
arXiv cs.SE0 views
arXiv:2610.31698v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly complete tasks through live graphical user interfaces (GUIs). Because the model cannot directly operate the GUI, these systems often rely on tools to capture screenshots or UI trees, translate model outputs into GUI actions, and report whether the interface changed. We study failures where this tool-mediated interaction makes the agent's view of the task diverge from the live GUI. We construct Malva, a defect library with 335 confirmed real-world failures from 40 open-source applications. These failures fall into 11 defect patterns rooted in state representation, state transition, and synchronization problems. They are widespread: 90% of the studied applications contain more than one defect type. They are also often silent: incorrectness appears in 86.6% of failures, including 119 cases that produce wrong behavior without a fail-stop signal. We operationalize this taxonomy with MalvaGuard, a pre-deployment static contract checker that reaches 57.3% precision and 76.8% recall on an additional 20-application corpus.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31698PreviousTreeWY: Speculative Verification for Gated DeltaNet HybridsNextBefore the Ticket: Grounding HPC User Support in Documentation and Resolved Tickets with an Agentic LLM Assistant
Related posts
Most voted crypto projects on Coinvote, Oct 26 to Nov 1, 2026
0dev.to Data
Bluesky This Week — trending topics & AI brand mentions (2026-11-02)
0dev.to Data
Gemini 4 Carbon e DeepSeek V4.1 Flash Cyber: a Guerra Cibernética Autônoma e o Topo do Artificial Analysis
0dev.to Machine Learning
What can an AI agent do for you every day?
0dev.to Machine Learning
Mon modèle de paris semblait excellent sur 3 671 prédictions. Il n'a jamais battu le bookmaker.
0dev.to Machine Learning
HR manager LinkedIn About section examples you can adapt
0dev.to Career