AI & ML
Understanding Verification Vulnerabilities in Cross-chain Bridges: An Empirical Study
arXiv cs.CR0 views
arXiv:2610.13170v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: With the rapid development of blockchain technology, numerous heterogeneous blockchains have emerged, each featuring distinct architectures, consensus mechanisms, and application ecosystems. Cross-chain bridges have consequently become a critical infrastructure component, typically relying on smart contracts to facilitate message passing and asset transfers across heterogeneous blockchains. Unlike single-chain contracts, bridge contracts introduce additional verification logic to validate external-chain data, such as state proofs, message sender identities, and signatures. However, correctly implementing such logic is challenging. We refer to vulnerabilities that violate the security guarantees of cross-chain verification as Cross-chain Verification Vulnerabilities (CVVs). To characterize CVVs, we conduct the first systematic empirical study of this vulnerability class. By analyzing 588 security audit reports from 36 real-world cross-chain bridge projects, we derive 11 CVV patterns and organize them into 5 high-level categories according to the affected verification properties. Following this taxonomy, we construct a CVV dataset containing 830 vulnerability instances across 786 contract files. The dataset establishes mappings among audit reports, audited source-code versions, affected source files, and CVV-pattern labels. We then assess existing detection approaches. Current tools provide limited documented coverage of CVV patterns, while only two of four evaluated LLMs outperform an all-pattern constant baseline of 29.3% Macro-F1; the best reaches 51.2%. Together, the limited tool coverage and inconsistent LLM gains motivate detection methods tailored to cross-chain verification semantics.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13170PreviousSafety Graph: When Safety Responses Become Attack Surfaces in Cyber-Physical SystemsNextUnderstanding and Mitigating Cross-Session Attacks via Persistent Artifacts in Agent Skill Composition
Related posts

Copilot Fusion's Local Model Preview: Only One of Three Stages Runs on Your Machine
0dev.to AI

Meituan shipped LongCat-2.5
0dev.to AI
Standard bf16 Rounding Discards 99% of Your RL Policy Updates
0dev.to AI
Why Are Startups Choosing Coworking Space in Pune in 2026?
0dev.to AI
What a 32GB GPU actually lets you run locally
0dev.to AI

LLM weak random number generator detection test
0dev.to Security