Backend
When Do Self-Supervised Representations Help Speech Restoration?
arXiv cs.SD0 views
arXiv:2610.30869v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Self-supervised learning (SSL) representations are widely used in speech restoration (SR), and the prevailing trend is SSL feature cleansing: fine-tuning the SSL to recover clean features from degraded speech, then conditioning the restoration model on them. However, the representational capability of SSL when encoding degraded speech has been underexplored, and we ask whether cleansing always benefits SR training. Across SSL encoders and perceptual quality proxies, we discover perceptual correlation collapse---under severe degradation, cleansing degraded SSL features toward clean ones misaligns with the SR objective. We hypothesize the restoration backbone can supply the SSL with clues to resolve this collapse, since its intermediate layers already produce partially restored features. We therefore propose Early Restoration Injection (ERI), which routes intermediate features from the restoration backbone into the SSL through a lightweight conditioning network. ERI excels over the unconditioned baseline and, on the VoiceFixer benchmark, achieves competitive performance among multiple baselines.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30869PreviousMixJudge: Learning a Language-Queryable Critic for Vocal MixingNextMQAScore: Fine-Grained Text-Music Alignment Evaluation via Large Audio Language Model
Related posts
I read all 308 open jobs at xAI: 54% are in its data center team, and most of them are in Memphis
0dev.to AI
Claude Code marketing analytics with an app-scoped key
0dev.to AI
I red-teamed my own support bot with 30 scenarios. It failed 7 — here's the harness.
0dev.to AI
The Log That Told Everyone the Password: Redacting Secrets in n8n Execution Logs
0dev.to WebDev
Your AI Portal Isn't Ready Until a Stranger Can Recover from Failure
0dev.to WebDev
API traffic monitoring: what to track, and how to set it up for a Node API
0dev.to Security