AI & ML
Who&When Pro: Can LLMs Really Attribute Failures in AI Agents?
arXiv cs.MA0 views
arXiv:2607.09996v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Automated failure attribution uses LLMs to identify where and why agentic systems fail. As agents become more capable, their failures become subtler, making automated attribution increasingly important. We introduce Who&When Pro, a large-scale benchmark for automated failure attribution in agentic systems. Using a strictly controlled pipeline that injects a failure only after exactly replaying a successful prefix, we construct 12,326 failed trajectories with golden labels across 3 modalities and 26 benchmarks covering various scenarios. Beyond benchmarking, we conduct extensive experiments and analyses, revealing systematic patterns in how models attribute failures across modalities, protocols, and model families, and providing empirical guidance for future automated failure attribution systems.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.09996PreviousMode 0: Architecture, Risk Taxonomy, and Standardization Pathway for RCU-Assisted V2X Safety CommunicationNextIndirect Geoeconomic Influence: A Switching Dynamical Systems Framework for Mechanism Design
Related posts
Qodo builds context into AI code review with Codex
0OpenAI Blog

Ford promises not to sell your driving habits to data brokers
0The Verge
Snap settles lawsuit accusing platform of fueling teen depression and eating disorders
0TechCrunch
Scrape LinkedIn job postings without logging in (Python + Google Sheets)
0dev.to
Same model, same defences: 7 document attacks down to 0, chat attacks barely moved
0dev.to
Skill to Create Product Videos
0Hacker News