The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) has blessed seven C++ language revisions since 1998. The language is mostly developed by ISO's Working Group 21, which considers proposed additions and amendments, integrates them into a document, and then presents that document to the main ISO body to be voted on as a standard. On October 23, for the first time ever, ISO declined to ratify a document presented by Working Group 21, leaving the future of the C++26 standard in doubt. The decision was driven by controversy around a proposed new "contracts" feature that would add pre- and post-conditions to function signatures.
PreviousIntroducing Polo: a Wayland MATE compositorNextStenberg: 30 years of Internet transfers with curl
Related posts

‘Hey Gemini’ hotword debuts on Android XR glasses
09to5Google
Cyber Chaos Monkey: Staying ahead of security threats with AI agents
0Shopify Engineering

Read Nvidia’s internal emails about the ‘extraordinarily difficult period’ ahead
0The Verge
Cyberattack on Fireworks AI allowed hackers to access Notion customers’ chat transcripts
0TechCrunch
Norwest pushes deeper into AI with new $4B fund
0TechCrunch
Guardrail para fintechs
0dev.to