AI & ML
The probabilistic bound for perfect hashing is sharp only for binary alphabets
arXiv math.IT0 views
arXiv:2611.08230v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We investigate the optimal asymptotic rate $R_q$ of perfect $q$-hash codes, a fundamental extremal problem in combinatorics, information theory, and computer science. Let $B_q=-\log_2(1-q!/q^q)/(q-1)$ denote the classical probabilistic lower bound. We prove that $R_q=B_q$ if and only if $q=2$, establishing an explicit strict improvement for every $q\ge3$ and settling the first assertion of a conjecture of Xing and Yuan (Combinatorica 43 (2023), 347--366). More significantly, we show that, for every $\eta>0$, $R_q\ge B_q+\exp(-(2+\eta)q)$ for all sufficiently large integers $q$. This improves the previously known increments of scale $\exp(-3q+O(\ln q))$ by an exponential factor. We also establish a structural limitation of the concatenation method. For pairwise uniform inner codes of subexponential length, the resulting rate bound exceeds $B_q$ by at most $\exp(-3q+o(q))$. Thus, exponentially long inner codes are necessary to achieve the new improvement scale within this framework. Our proofs combine Fourier analysis, high-dimensional simplex codes, additive permutation counts, and entropy bounds for hypergraph matchings. We further strengthen lower bounds from short inner codes and improve several known numerical estimates.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08230PreviousStealthy Malicious Interference Detection in UAV Formations: A Power-Domain Signaling Game ApproachNextA class of asymptotically optimal authentication codes with secrecy
Related posts
How to Evaluate RAG Retrieval in 2026: Question Sets, Metrics That Mislead, and a Practical Recipe
0dev.to
Reading a Competitor's Pricing Page Like an Engineer
0dev.to
Day 4: Adding VLAN support
0dev.to

Browser-local image tools: how to check the upload boundary
0dev.to
A Space Heater Is the Hardest Question You Can Ask a Smart Plug
0dev.to
Geometric Functional Inequalities for Markov Processes: An Invitation via the Langevin Diffusion
0arXiv stat.CO