AI & ML
Watermarking Without Standards Is Not AI Governance
arXiv cs.CR0 views
arXiv:2505.23814v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Watermarking has emerged as a leading technical proposal for attributing generative AI content and is increasingly cited in global governance frameworks. This position paper argues that current implementations risk serving as symbolic compliance rather than delivering effective oversight. We identify a growing gap between regulatory expectations and the technical limitations of existing watermarking schemes. Through analysis of policy proposals and industry practices, we show how incentive structures disincentivize robust, auditable deployments. To realign watermarking with governance goals, we propose a three-layer framework encompassing technical standards, audit infrastructure, and enforcement mechanisms. Without enforceable requirements and independent verification, watermarking will remain inadequate for accountability and ultimately undermine broader efforts in AI safety and regulation.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.23814PreviousfaulTPM: Exposing AMD fTPMs' Deepest SecretsNextCryptanalysis of Isogeny-Based Quantum Money with Rational Points
Related posts
Are LLM Safety Judges Policy-Invariant? A Three-Principle Stress-Test
0arXiv cs.SE
Vibe Coding in Software Development: A Multivocal Literature Review
0arXiv cs.SE
Large Language Models for Multi-Lingual Equivalent Mutant Detection: An Extended Empirical Study
0arXiv cs.SE
Characterizing Robustness in Semantic Code Clone Detection
0arXiv cs.SE
AI Slop and the Software Commons
0arXiv cs.SE
Detecting Silent Faults at the Environment-Trainer Boundary in Reinforcement Learning
0arXiv cs.SE