AI & ML
A two-stage approach to satellite constellation optimization: classical and QUBO formulations
arXiv eess.SY0 views
arXiv:2610.01885v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The design of satellite constellations for Earth observation requires balancing spatial coverage, revisit time, cost, and operational complexity. This paper considers the problem of designing the orbits of a given number of Low Earth Orbit (LEO) or Very Low Earth Orbit (VLEO) satellites to maximize the spatial and temporal resolution achieved over a prescribed set of ground targets. This kind of problem is inherently nonconvex and possibly combinatorial, making its solution computationally demanding for large constellations and target sets. To address this challenge, we propose a two-stage optimization strategy that separates spatial-coverage design from temporal-resolution optimization, thereby reducing the complexity of the overall problem. Two variants of the method are developed. The first employs continuous decision variables during the spatial-optimization stage, whereas the second discretizes these variables and reformulates the problem as a Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problem. The latter formulation enables the use of efficient classical QUBO solvers and is directly compatible with quantum-annealing hardware. The proposed framework provides a scalable approach to the design of heterogeneous LEO and VLEO Earth-observation constellations and establishes a pathway for exploiting emerging quantum-optimization technologies in satellite mission design. Preliminary simulation results are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the strategy.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.01885PreviousNetworked Admissibility-Preserving Control for Directed Safe CoordinationNextEnergy Efficiency Maximization in RSMA-Based LEO Satellite Networks Assisted by UAV-Mounted BD-Active RIS: A Hybrid DRL Strategy
Related posts

Running Local LLMs in the Browser with WebGPU and Transformers.js
0dev.to

ChatGPT Productivity for Developers: Build a Workflow, Not a Prompt Library
0dev.to AI
A human approval step for an LLM agent: the boundary that matters
0dev.to Security
如何像 osFoundry 一樣用 Python 包裝 Codex CLI
0dev.to Python

The Microsoft Lab That Worked on AutoGen Is Over. AutoGen Already Gets No Security Fixes
0dev.to Python
GitHub Copilot Just Separated Your BYOK Spend From Its Own — Here's What the New Usage API Actually Shows You
0dev.to DevOps