Database
Monus vs. Interpretations in Semiring Semantics
arXiv cs.DB0 views
arXiv:2611.08474v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Interpretations have been widely used in the study of provenance of queries on semiring-annotated databases. Here, we consider two different interpretation-based semantics for first-order formulas in negation normal form, namely, the canonical-interpretation semantics and the compatible-interpretation semantics. We show that the resulting query languages cannot express the monus operation on semiring-annotated relations, when the annotations come from the bag semiring or the tropical semiring or the fuzzy semiring. Consequently, the semantics of SQL cannot be captured using the interpretation-based semantics considered here.
Source:https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.08474PreviousCascadeFilter: Cost-Efficient Semantic Filtering with Joint Threshold SelectionNextTyped Knowledge over Constructive Institutions
Related posts
Build Buddy, Day 3: my slowest C# error was really a cold start
0dev.to C#
AI Can Write the Code. Who Takes Responsibility for the System?
0dev.to Programming
I built a MySQL practice lab on SQLite in the browser. Here is where the two disagree
0dev.to JavaScript
JSONB vs columns in PostgreSQL, measured on 2 million rows
0dev.to Database
Fix Supabase "Database error saving new user"
0dev.to Database
Stopping Black Friday Oversells: A Stock Reservation Data Model
0dev.to WebDev